2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.80 | 4.76 | ||||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.93 | 4.96 | ||||
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the Residential College to senior administrators. | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.00 | 4.93 | ||||
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.93 | 4.84 | ||||
| Q5 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.82 | 4.90 | ||||
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous merit review process. | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4.78 | 4.75 | ||||
| Q7 | manages administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.82 | 4.69 | ||||
| Q8 | manages the Residential College's resources well. | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.97 | 4.82 | ||||
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the Residential College. | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 | 4.91 | ||||
| Q10 | ensures that Residential College policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.93 | 4.78 | ||||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.93 | 4.91 |