2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 4.00 | 3.00 | ||||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 7 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4.00 | 4.00 | ||||
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 4 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3.67 | 4.67 | ||||
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 8 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4.00 | 4.00 | ||||
| Q5 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 3 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3.75 | 3.00 | ||||
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3.70 | 2.75 | ||||
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 4 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3.83 | 4.25 | ||||
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3.58 | 4.00 | ||||
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3.50 | 3.50 | ||||
| Q10 | ensures that departmental policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 6 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4.00 | 4.67 | ||||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 5 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 3.62 | 3.00 |