2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 13 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4.25 | 4.56 | ||||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 12 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4.20 | 4.20 | ||||
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 10 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4.19 | 4.50 | ||||
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 14 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4.61 | 4.50 | ||||
| Q5 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4.43 | 4.75 | ||||
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4.50 | 4.00 | ||||
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 8 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4.12 | 4.25 | ||||
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 8 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 4.11 | 4.57 | ||||
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 11 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4.33 | 4.50 | ||||
| Q10 | ensures that departmental policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.44 | 4.20 | ||||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 11 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4.17 | 4.50 |