2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 9 | 12 | 11 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 3.23 | 3.69 | 3.66 | 3.70 | 4.12 | 4.12 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 13 | 8 | 13 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 3.27 | 3.53 | 3.42 | 3.75 | 4.19 | 4.19 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 10 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 14 | 3 | 2.62 | 3.15 | 3.62 | 3.44 | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 8 | 11 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 3 | 3.00 | 2.96 | 2.96 | 3.77 | 3.75 | 3.75 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 8 | 14 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 3.64 | 3.94 | 3.59 | 3.66 | 4.17 | 4.17 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 12 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 3.06 | 3.72 | 3.80 | 4.17 | 4.38 | 4.38 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 12 | 12 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 3.58 | 3.70 | 3.90 | 4.13 | 4.59 | 4.59 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 10 | 8 | 2 | 12 | 13 | 3 | 2.29 | 2.64 | 3.21 | 3.71 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 8 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 3.44 | 3.35 | 3.56 | 3.88 | 3.75 | 3.75 |
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 12 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 3.07 | 2.94 | 3.54 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 8 | 13 | 2 | 6 | 19 | 0 | 2.33 | 2.80 | 3.11 | 3.54 | 4.18 | 4.18 |