2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 3 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3.50 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 3 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3.50 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3.25 |
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3.67 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 8 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4.33 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 2 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3.17 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 2 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3.50 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 3 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3.71 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 2 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3.08 |
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3.50 |
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 2.75 |