2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 12 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.58 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.50 |
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 8 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.31 |
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 11 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4.50 |
| Q5 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 7 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4.17 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4.25 |
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 9 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4.28 |
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 8 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4.20 |
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 13 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4.65 |
| Q10 | ensures that departmental policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 15 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.77 |
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 13 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4.65 |