2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 15 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.77 | 4.60 | 4.17 | |||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 14 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.79 | 4.60 | 4.33 | |||
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 12 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4.75 | 4.50 | 4.25 | |||
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 12 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.67 | 4.60 | 4.12 | |||
| Q5 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 11 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4.68 | 4.50 | 4.50 | |||
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 8 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4.36 | 4.38 | 4.00 | |||
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 12 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4.75 | 4.50 | 4.00 | |||
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 12 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4.75 | 4.33 | 4.00 | |||
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 14 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.71 | 4.50 | 4.00 | |||
| Q10 | ensures that departmental policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 13 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.69 | 4.38 | 4.17 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.92 | 4.60 | 4.12 |