2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 13 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4.23 | 3.96 | 4.04 | 4.33 | 4.65 | 4.65 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 13 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4.18 | 3.59 | 4.00 | 3.88 | 4.61 | 4.61 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 7 | 12 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3.75 | 3.38 | 3.50 | 3.92 | 4.64 | 4.64 |
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 7 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3.71 | 3.32 | 3.77 | 4.00 | 4.75 | 4.75 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 15 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 4.50 | 4.00 | 4.30 | 4.54 | 4.60 | 4.60 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 13 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4.31 | 4.09 | 4.21 | 4.45 | 4.83 | 4.83 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 13 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4.17 | 3.85 | 4.05 | 4.17 | 4.77 | 4.77 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 13 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4.15 | 3.92 | 4.06 | 4.06 | 4.71 | 4.71 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 10 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 3.60 | 3.75 | 3.50 | 3.86 | 4.83 | 4.83 |
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 8 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3.77 | 3.68 | 3.40 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 14 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4.22 | 3.90 | 3.91 | 4.18 | 4.77 | 4.77 |