2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 12 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4.33 | 4.50 | 4.65 | 4.83 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 7 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3.81 | 4.10 | 4.00 | 4.21 | 3.50 | 3.50 |
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 7 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3.95 | 4.50 | 4.07 | 4.36 | 3.88 | 3.88 |
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 5 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3.11 | 3.50 | 3.06 | 3.69 | 2.50 | 2.50 |
| Q5 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 4 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3.73 | 3.79 | 3.71 | 3.92 | 3.50 | 3.50 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 6 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.79 | 3.82 | 4.17 | 4.17 |
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 5 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3.92 | 4.20 | 4.00 | 4.08 | 3.88 | 3.88 |
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 6 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3.80 | 4.55 | 4.00 | 4.36 | 3.50 | 3.50 |
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 12 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4.25 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 4.64 | 3.50 | 3.50 |
| Q10 | ensures that departmental policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 4 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3.44 | 3.88 | 3.64 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 7 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3.91 | 4.30 | 4.55 | 4.36 | 3.50 | 3.50 |