2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 18 | 52 | 27 | 23 | 11 | 8 | 3.59 | 3.71 | 3.65 | 3.68 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 19 | 53 | 25 | 17 | 16 | 7 | 3.63 | 3.51 | 3.69 | 3.57 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 6 | 29 | 29 | 18 | 33 | 19 | 2.72 | 2.43 | 2.63 | 1.98 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 6 | 31 | 28 | 18 | 40 | 16 | 2.62 | 3.00 | 2.97 | 2.69 | ||
| Q5 | effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials. | 18 | 43 | 21 | 11 | 16 | 29 | 3.65 | 3.81 | 3.83 | 3.32 | ||
| Q6 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus. | 30 | 43 | 10 | 23 | 21 | 9 | 3.72 | 3.72 | 3.70 | 3.51 | ||
| Q7 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus. | 10 | 35 | 22 | 16 | 15 | 38 | 3.32 | 3.67 | 3.20 | 3.06 | ||
| Q8 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 16 | 45 | 20 | 22 | 28 | 7 | 3.27 | 3.30 | 3.33 | 2.78 |