2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 3.60 | 4.00 | 4.14 | |||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 3.17 | 3.75 | 4.06 | |||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 3.17 | 3.83 | 4.12 | |||
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 3.25 | 3.64 | 3.58 | |||
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 3.00 | 3.60 | 3.75 | |||
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 11 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.36 | 4.67 | |||
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 9 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 4.00 | 4.10 | 4.50 | |||
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 7 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3.83 | 4.00 | 4.40 | |||
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 10 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4.00 | 4.55 | 3.67 | |||
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 7 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 3.08 | 3.75 | 4.00 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 3.75 | 3.90 | 4.40 |