2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 8 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4.14 | 4.17 | 4.58 | 4.50 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 4 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 2.42 | 3.75 | 3.00 | 2.83 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 3 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3.14 | 3.75 | 3.00 | 3.30 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 5 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3.29 | 3.80 | 3.00 | 3.25 | ||
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3.70 | 4.00 | 4.06 | 3.80 | ||
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 11 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4.73 | 4.58 | 4.58 | 4.27 | ||
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 9 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4.31 | 4.10 | 4.30 | 4.20 | ||
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 5 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3.88 | 4.25 | 3.70 | 3.90 | ||
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 8 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4.25 | 4.79 | 4.55 | 4.56 | ||
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2.75 | 2.67 | 2.30 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 6 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3.94 | 4.07 | 4.10 | 3.83 |