2009 evaluation results

General Administration Issues, Dearborn

combined report for all faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	2009 median	2008 median	2007 median	2006 median	2005^* median	2004^* median
Q1	I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost).	2	11	10	29	60	6	1.43	1.15
Q2	Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1.	3	16	11	24	50	11	1.58	1.28
Q3	I support the on-line administration of student teaching evaluations.	25	29	22	10	25	6	3.43	3.25
Q4	I support the expansion of on-line courses.	23	36	24	17	17	0	3.51	3.66
Q5	The resources available to promote student retention are adequate.	2	16	32	33	15	20	2.53	2.50
Q6	Experiential learning opportunities should be widely available to all students.	35	55	17	2	3	5	4.12	4.17
Q7	The level of faculty engagement in events outside their unit is satisfactory.	4	25	32	24	20	12	2.77	2.45
Q8	There is a satisfactory level of campus effort toward achieving the metropolitan vision.	6	31	35	20	13	13	3.06	2.95

Response rate: 23% Responded 119 Eligible 523 (299 Senate, 224 non-Senate)
^*medians from 2005 and 2004 computed only from Ann Arbor campus University Senate faculty

Separate reports by faculty groups

Notes on reporting

Back to 2009 results

Back to AEC home