Administration Evaluation
Administration Evaluation
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2010 median | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005 median | 2004 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.96 | 4.81 | 4.92 | 5.00 | |||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4.62 | |||
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the Institute to senior administrators. | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.92 | 4.89 | 4.75 | 5.00 | |||
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4.50 | 3.25 | 3.75 | 4.50 | |||
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.57 | 4.58 | 3.50 | 4.67 | |||
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous merit review process. | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.69 | 4.00 | 4.50 | 4.83 | |||
| Q7 | manages administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.72 | 4.58 | 3.67 | 4.67 | |||
| Q8 | manages the Institute's resources well. | 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.80 | 4.67 | 4.50 | 4.94 | |||
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the Institute. | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.86 | 4.89 | 4.80 | 4.94 | |||
| Q10 | ensures that Institute policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4.20 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.50 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.86 | 4.71 | 4.62 | 4.94 |