Administration Evaluation
Administration Evaluation
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2010 median | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005 median | 2004 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching | ||||||||||||||
| Q1 | The availability of undergraduate course offerings in my program / department is excellent. | 7 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.17 | ||||||
| Q2 | The availability of graduate course offerings in my program / department is excellent. | 4 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3.77 | ||||||
| Q3 | The technological resources in my classrooms meet my needs. | 2 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3.82 | ||||||
| Q4 | I am provided sufficient GSI support for my classes. | 4 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3.80 | ||||||
| Q5 | My teaching load is appropriate. | 6 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.10 | ||||||
| Q6 | The courses I am asked to teach are appropriate for me. | 11 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.42 | ||||||
| Q7 | Administrative and research buyouts in my department are handled well. | 9 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4.10 | ||||||
| Q8 | My chair actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 7 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4.05 | 4.43 | 4.50 | ||||
| Research | ||||||||||||||
| Q9 | My department provides adequate space for my research. | 9 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4.25 | ||||||
| Q10 | My department provides adequate computing resources for my work. | 7 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4.12 | ||||||
| Q11 | My department provides other necessary material resources for my research. | 7 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.00 | ||||||
| Q12 | My department makes it easy for me to recruit graduate students for my research. | 4 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 3.71 | ||||||
| Q13 | My department provides excellent support for research grant submission and management. | 13 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.62 | ||||||
| Q14 | My chair actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 12 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.82 | 4.82 | ||||
| Environment | ||||||||||||||
| Q15 | My chair consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 4 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3.72 | 4.25 | 4.58 | ||||
| Q16 | My chair is responsive when I have concerns. | 8 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4.07 | ||||||
| Q17 | My chair fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 7 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4.17 | 4.86 | 4.80 | ||||
| Q18 | My chair employs a fair and transparent faculty salary policy. | 3 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 3.69 | ||||||
| Q19 | My chair facilitates my advancement and recognition. | 4 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3.69 | ||||||
| Q20 | My chair promotes the strategic interests of the department. | 9 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4.21 | ||||||
| Q21 | I am satisfied with the transparency of my department's administrative policies. | 3 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3.61 | ||||||
| Q22 | I am satisfied with the implementation of my department's administrative policies. | 3 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3.61 | ||||||
| Q23 | My chair makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 8 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4.00 | ||||||
| Q24 | I have confidence in my chair's leadership overall. | 10 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4.25 | 4.67 | 4.86 | ||||