Administration Evaluation

Chancellor, University of Michigan - Dearborn, Daniel Little

Senate faculty only

combined report for all faculty

non-senate faculty only

separate reports by unit

University Senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	2010 median	2009 median	2008 median	2007 median	2006 median	2005 median	2004 median
Q1	actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	25	42	22	16	11	10	3.71	3.58	3.57	3.54	3.62
Q2	actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	26	38	28	15	11	8	3.63	3.71	3.52	3.68	3.57
Q3	consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	7	21	30	22	28	19	2.63	2.77	2.50	2.45	1.95
Q4	makes excellent administrative appointments.	8	23	36	25	22	13	2.78	2.55	2.91	2.91	2.62
Q5	effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials.	35	33	22	8	7	20	3.97	3.74	3.80	3.82	3.25
Q6	is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus.	36	30	25	16	13	6	3.70	3.73	3.67	3.63	3.43
Q7	successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus.	11	36	22	17	12	28	3.41	3.41	3.43	3.00	2.96
Q8	inspires confidence in leadership overall.	26	34	24	15	23	3	3.46	3.29	3.37	3.28	2.57

Response rate: 42% Responded 127 Eligible 299

combined report for all faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	2010 median	2009 median	2008 median	2007 median	2006 median	2005 median	2004 median
Q1	actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	30	56	23	19	12	13	3.79	3.59	3.71	3.65	3.68
Q2	actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	30	50	32	19	12	10	3.67	3.63	3.51	3.69	3.57
Q3	consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	9	26	36	29	33	21	2.62	2.72	2.43	2.63	1.98
Q4	makes excellent administrative appointments.	11	27	43	28	27	18	2.80	2.62	3.00	2.97	2.69
Q5	effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials.	40	42	26	11	9	24	3.93	3.65	3.81	3.83	3.32
Q6	is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus.	41	42	30	19	14	7	3.74	3.72	3.72	3.70	3.51
Q7	successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus.	15	41	29	17	13	38	3.45	3.32	3.67	3.20	3.06
Q8	inspires confidence in leadership overall.	29	47	29	19	25	3	3.53	3.27	3.30	3.33	2.78

Response rate: 27% Responded 154 Eligible 579 (299 Senate, 280 non-Senate)

non-senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	2010 median	2009 median	2008 median	2007 median	2006 median	2005 median	2004 median
Q1	actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	5	14	1	3	1	3	4.00	3.60	3.93	3.93	3.83
Q2	actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	4	12	4	4	1	2	3.79	3.22	3.50	3.71	3.57
Q3	consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2	5	6	7	5	2	2.58	2.57	2.33	3.14	2.04
Q4	makes excellent administrative appointments.	3	4	7	3	5	5	2.93	2.78	3.21	3.19	2.88
Q5	effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials.	5	9	4	3	2	4	3.78	3.08	3.81	3.90	3.50
Q6	is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus.	5	12	5	3	1	1	3.83	3.70	3.79	3.88	3.62
Q7	successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus.	4	5	7	0	1	10	3.60	3.08	4.05	3.60	3.25
Q8	inspires confidence in leadership overall.	3	13	5	4	2	0	3.69	3.25	3.19	3.44	3.43

Response rate: 10% Responded 27 Eligible 280

Separate reports by unit

College of Arts, Sciences, and Letters

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	2010 median	2009 median	2008 median	2007 median	2006 median	2005 median	2004 median
Q1	actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	17	34	13	12	5	10	3.81	3.44	3.74	3.61	3.73
Q2	actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	16	29	19	12	7	8	3.62	3.39	3.39	3.54	3.39
Q3	consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2	15	22	19	20	14	2.50	2.79	2.15	2.50	1.80
Q4	makes excellent administrative appointments.	4	14	25	17	16	16	2.70	2.77	2.92	2.98	2.65
Q5	effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials.	18	28	16	7	4	17	3.84	3.56	3.67	3.85	3.55
Q6	is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus.	21	28	19	10	6	7	3.75	3.80	3.68	3.73	3.64
Q7	successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus.	7	22	22	7	3	30	3.43	3.55	3.79	3.50	3.38
Q8	inspires confidence in leadership overall.	13	32	19	12	11	3	3.55	3.27	3.19	3.36	2.79

Response rate: 26% Responded 92 Eligible 348

College of Engineering and Computer Science

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	2010 median	2009 median	2008 median	2007 median	2006 median	2005 median	2004 median
Q1	actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3	5	6	1	3	2	3.33	3.89	4.60	3.57	3.19
Q2	actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	3	6	6	3	1	1	3.42	4.00	4.25	3.85	3.79
Q3	consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	3	4	3	7	2	1	2.67	3.38	4.25	2.38	2.38
Q4	makes excellent administrative appointments.	1	4	5	5	5	0	2.50	2.10	3.88	2.33	2.75
Q5	effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials.	5	6	3	2	2	2	3.83	4.07	4.75	3.81	2.33
Q6	is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus.	6	3	4	4	3	0	3.25	3.50	4.67	3.00	2.60
Q7	successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus.	1	9	1	5	4	0	3.50	3.69	4.25	2.12	2.86
Q8	inspires confidence in leadership overall.	5	4	3	4	4	0	3.17	3.50	4.17	3.25	2.71

Response rate: 22% Responded 20 Eligible 89

Dearborn College of Business

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	2010 median	2009 median	2008 median	2007 median	2006 median	2005 median	2004 median
Q1	actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	7	5	0	4	4	1	3.90	3.69	3.67	3.30	3.00
Q2	actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	8	4	2	2	4	1	4.00	3.58	3.50	3.69	3.38
Q3	consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2	6	5	0	6	2	3.20	2.50	3.00	2.88	1.88
Q4	makes excellent administrative appointments.	3	5	4	1	6	2	3.12	3.00	3.33	3.08	2.67
Q5	effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials.	10	5	3	0	2	1	4.50	3.64	3.80	3.57	3.67
Q6	is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus.	9	3	3	2	4	0	4.00	3.71	3.86	3.57	3.38
Q7	successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus.	3	4	4	2	5	3	3.00	2.67	3.25	2.67	2.40
Q8	inspires confidence in leadership overall.	8	2	4	1	6	0	3.38	3.56	3.64	2.92	2.62

Response rate: 28% Responded 21 Eligible 75

Dearborn School of Education

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	2010 median	2009 median	2008 median	2007 median	2006 median	2005 median	2004 median
Q1	actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3	11	2	2	0	0	3.95	3.69	3.42	4.25	3.90
Q2	actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	2	11	3	2	0	0	3.86	3.78	3.40	4.08	3.64
Q3	consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2	1	5	2	4	4	2.70	1.83	2.62	3.00	2.00
Q4	makes excellent administrative appointments.	3	3	8	4	0	0	3.12	1.75	3.00	3.25	2.50
Q5	effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials.	7	2	4	1	1	3	4.25	3.70	3.93	4.14	3.00
Q6	is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus.	5	7	3	2	1	0	3.93	3.75	3.71	4.17	3.17
Q7	successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus.	4	5	2	1	1	5	4.00	3.00	3.86	3.83	2.90
Q8	inspires confidence in leadership overall.	3	8	3	2	2	0	3.75	3.33	3.20	3.90	2.50

Response rate: 33% Responded 18 Eligible 54

Notes on reporting

Back to 2010 results

Back to AEC home