Administration Evaluation

Dean, Rackham Graduate School, Janet Weiss

combined report for all faculty

Senate faculty only

non-senate faculty only

combined report for all faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2013/14 median
Q1	Rackham distributes funding in an equitable and transparent manner.	28	85	65	49	30	103	3.26
Q2	Rackham makes student awards in an equitable and transparent manner.	43	102	61	39	24	90	3.60
Q3	Rackham adequately publicizes its funding allocations to the various graduate programs.	37	89	61	51	32	89	3.35
Q4	Rackham makes known its policies for allocating funding to the various graduate programs.	27	76	66	56	31	100	3.12
Q5	Rackham adequately publicizes its distribution of awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	33	101	63	46	23	91	3.51
Q6	Rackham makes known its policies for making awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	32	99	70	44	27	82	3.43
Q7	All programs receive roughly the same funding from Rackham per student.	7	16	44	39	36	215	2.40
Q8	All units receive roughly the same number of awards per student.	6	12	48	41	32	217	2.41
Q9	Rackham decision-making is transparent.	15	41	68	74	61	98	2.43
Q10	Rackham allows graduate programs to have influence on policy in proportion to their size.	12	28	58	39	31	186	2.74

Response rate: 8% Responded 362 Eligible 4417 (3507 Senate, 910 non-Senate)

University Senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2013/14 median
Q1	Rackham distributes funding in an equitable and transparent manner.	26	81	56	45	28	64	3.30
Q2	Rackham makes student awards in an equitable and transparent manner.	41	97	49	36	24	53	3.65
Q3	Rackham adequately publicizes its funding allocations to the various graduate programs.	35	82	51	48	29	54	3.39
Q4	Rackham makes known its policies for allocating funding to the various graduate programs.	25	72	57	50	30	63	3.15
Q5	Rackham adequately publicizes its distribution of awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	31	95	51	42	21	58	3.56
Q6	Rackham makes known its policies for making awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	30	92	59	40	25	50	3.48
Q7	All programs receive roughly the same funding from Rackham per student.	5	15	36	37	34	170	2.30
Q8	All units receive roughly the same number of awards per student.	4	11	41	38	31	171	2.33
Q9	Rackham decision-making is transparent.	13	40	58	69	56	61	2.40
Q10	Rackham allows graduate programs to have influence on policy in proportion to their size.	10	26	51	34	30	144	2.73

Response rate: 9% Responded 302 Eligible 3507

non-senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2013/14 median
Q1	Rackham distributes funding in an equitable and transparent manner.	2	4	9	4	2	39	3.00
Q2	Rackham makes student awards in an equitable and transparent manner.	2	5	12	3	0	37	3.17
Q3	Rackham adequately publicizes its funding allocations to the various graduate programs.	2	7	10	3	3	35	3.15
Q4	Rackham makes known its policies for allocating funding to the various graduate programs.	2	4	9	6	1	37	2.94
Q5	Rackham adequately publicizes its distribution of awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	2	6	12	4	2	33	3.08
Q6	Rackham makes known its policies for making awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	2	7	11	4	2	32	3.14
Q7	All programs receive roughly the same funding from Rackham per student.	2	1	8	2	2	45	2.94
Q8	All units receive roughly the same number of awards per student.	2	1	7	3	1	46	2.93
Q9	Rackham decision-making is transparent.	2	1	10	5	5	37	2.65
Q10	Rackham allows graduate programs to have influence on policy in proportion to their size.	2	2	7	5	1	42	2.86

Response rate: 7% Responded 60 Eligible 910

Notes on reporting

Back to AY2013/2014 results

Back to AEC home