Administration Evaluation
Administration Evaluation
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | AY2014/15 median | AY2013/14 median | AY2012/13 median | AY2011/12 median | AY2010/11 median | AY2009/10 median | AY2008/09 median | AY2007/08 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.90 | 4.92 | 4.96 | 4.81 | 4.92 | 5.00 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.00 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4.62 |
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the Institute to senior administrators. | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.90 | 4.92 | 4.92 | 4.89 | 4.75 | 5.00 |
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.75 | 4.83 | 4.50 | 4.62 | 4.50 | 3.25 | 3.75 | 4.50 |
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 | 4.83 | 4.90 | 4.80 | 4.57 | 4.58 | 3.50 | 4.67 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous merit review process. | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.83 | 4.83 | 4.33 | 4.80 | 4.69 | 4.00 | 4.50 | 4.83 |
| Q7 | manages administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 | 4.83 | 4.75 | 4.92 | 4.72 | 4.58 | 3.67 | 4.67 |
| Q8 | manages the Institute's resources well. | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.75 | 4.80 | 4.80 | 4.67 | 4.50 | 4.94 |
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the Institute. | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.83 | 5.00 | 4.90 | 4.92 | 4.86 | 4.89 | 4.80 | 4.94 |
| Q10 | ensures that Institute policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.83 | 4.50 | 4.25 | 4.20 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.50 |
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.90 | 4.92 | 4.86 | 4.71 | 4.62 | 4.94 |