Administration Evaluation
Administration Evaluation
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | AY2014/15 median | AY2013/14 median | AY2012/13 median | AY2011/12 median | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching | ||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | The availability of undergraduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent. | 12 | 25 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 3.92 | 3.77 | 4.05 | 3.70 | |||||
| Q2 | The availability of graduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent. | 9 | 27 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 3.80 | 3.73 | 4.14 | 3.80 | |||||
| Q3 | The technological resources in my classrooms meet my needs. | 18 | 27 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4.13 | 4.50 | 4.24 | 4.68 | |||||
| Q4 | I am provided sufficient graduate student support for my classes. | 9 | 16 | 15 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 3.43 | 3.50 | 3.68 | 3.00 | |||||
| Q5 | My teaching load is appropriate. | 12 | 24 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3.81 | 3.82 | 3.95 | 3.83 | |||||
| Q6 | The courses I am asked to teach are appropriate for me. | 22 | 26 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4.25 | 4.38 | 4.43 | 4.36 | |||||
| Q7 | Administrative and research buyouts in my college/school are handled well. | 7 | 12 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 18 | 3.36 | 2.79 | 3.31 | 3.06 | |||||
| Q8 | My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 8 | 16 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 3.25 | 2.88 | 3.44 | 3.64 | |||||
| Research | ||||||||||||||||
| Q9 | My college/school provides adequate space for my research. | 20 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4.27 | 4.29 | 4.25 | 4.36 | |||||
| Q10 | My college/school provides adequate computing resources for my work. | 21 | 25 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4.26 | 4.24 | 4.24 | 4.25 | |||||
| Q11 | My college/school provides other necessary material resources for my research. | 14 | 26 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4.06 | 4.20 | 4.03 | 4.12 | |||||
| Q12 | My college/school makes it easy for me to recruit graduate students for my research. | 9 | 9 | 17 | 14 | 1 | 8 | 3.09 | 3.44 | 3.46 | 3.00 | |||||
| Q13 | My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management. | 6 | 9 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 24 | 3.32 | 3.27 | 3.38 | 3.25 | |||||
| Q14 | The number of faculty in my college/school is sufficient to support our research mission. | 11 | 15 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 3.57 | 3.45 | 3.77 | 3.30 | |||||
| Q15 | The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities. | 7 | 5 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 23 | 3.12 | 3.40 | 3.42 | 3.19 | |||||
| Q16 | My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 11 | 8 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 1 | 2.97 | 3.00 | 3.57 | 3.42 | |||||
| Environment | ||||||||||||||||
| Q17 | My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 10 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 21 | 0 | 2.23 | 1.90 | 2.10 | 2.12 | |||||
| Q18 | My dean promotes a collegial environment. | 10 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 23 | 0 | 2.10 | 2.00 | 2.33 | 3.17 | |||||
| Q19 | My dean is responsive when I have concerns. | 9 | 9 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 12 | 2.40 | 2.50 | 2.92 | 2.50 | |||||
| Q20 | My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances. | 7 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 2.31 | 2.07 | 2.58 | 2.00 | |||||
| Q21 | My dean fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 10 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 12 | 3.07 | 3.20 | 3.30 | 3.50 | |||||
| Q22 | My dean employs a fair and transparent faculty salary policy. | 6 | 8 | 8 | 15 | 16 | 5 | 2.20 | 2.15 | 2.50 | 2.75 | |||||
| Q23 | My dean facilitates my advancement and recognition. | 7 | 9 | 13 | 14 | 12 | 3 | 2.62 | 2.56 | 2.73 | 2.25 | |||||
| Q24 | My dean promotes the strategic interests of the college/school. | 11 | 19 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 3.55 | 2.64 | 3.19 | 3.71 | |||||
| Q25 | I am satisfied with the transparency of my college/school's administrative policies. | 6 | 10 | 12 | 11 | 19 | 0 | 2.41 | 2.00 | 2.10 | 2.67 | |||||
| Q26 | I am satisfied with the implementation of my college/school's administrative policies. | 9 | 10 | 13 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2.77 | 2.25 | 2.22 | 2.50 | |||||
| Q27 | My dean makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 7 | 10 | 5 | 20 | 14 | 0 | 2.20 | 1.92 | 2.07 | 2.80 | |||||
| Q28 | My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college. | 2 | 7 | 17 | 9 | 19 | 4 | 2.39 | 2.69 | 2.35 | 2.00 | |||||
| Q29 | My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college. | 2 | 1 | 8 | 18 | 24 | 2 | 1.64 | 1.60 | 1.85 | 1.81 | |||||
| Q30 | My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition | 3 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 28 | 2.72 | ||||||||
| Q31 | I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall. | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 21 | 0 | 2.50 | 2.67 | 2.35 | 3.21 | |||||
| Associate Deans | ||||||||||||||||
| Q32 | The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Faculty and Research, Wallace Hopp is fully satisfactory. | 17 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 16 | 2 | 3.12 | ||||||||
| Q33 | The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for MBA Programs, Valerie Suslow is fully satisfactory. | 14 | 17 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 3.71 | ||||||||
| Q34 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Executive Education, Scott DeRue is fully satisfactory. | 7 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 27 | 3.42 | ||||||||
| Q35 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Global Initiatives, MS Krishnan is fully satisfactory. | 7 | 12 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 20 | 3.50 | ||||||||
| Q36 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Specialty Masters Programs, Amy Dittmar is fully satisfactory. | 12 | 8 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 3.62 | ||||||||
| Q37 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs, Lynn Wooten is fully satisfactory. | 21 | 20 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 4.25 | ||||||||