Administration Evaluation

Opinions of Faculty (Dearborn Campus)

combined report for all faculty

Senate faculty only

non-senate faculty only

separate reports by unit

combined report for all faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median
Q1	UM-D should expand online teaching opportunities.	16	31	26	14	21	1	3.23	2.97
Q2	The Promotion and Tenure Process at UM-D is fair.	13	35	21	13	14	13	3.50	3.59
Q3	The budget system rewards program and degree innovation.	5	12	20	25	31	16	2.12	2.43
Q4	The criteria for merit considerations for my unit is transparent.	14	21	16	26	23	9	2.56	3.17
Q5	The merit pay system in my unit is fair.	10	16	24	19	23	15	2.67	3.25
Q6	Faculty are adequately represented on administrative searches.	12	32	14	14	29	9	3.04	2.50
Q7	Faculty are adequately rewarded for service contributions.	3	13	17	24	44	8	1.77	2.00
Q8	Adequate support is provided for grant writing and research.	6	21	26	20	25	10	2.65	2.58
Q9	My unit provides adequate academic advising.	19	23	25	16	19	7	3.14	3.61
Q10	Salary and Benefits are competitive with similar universities.	8	23	17	28	22	11	2.46	2.89
Q11	The campus is able to adequately attract new faculty.	9	30	21	21	16	12	3.05	2.89
Q12	I am confident that UM-D is maintaining selective standards in admissions.	5	17	23	29	29	7	2.28	2.00
Q13	The campus is making appropriate use of non-tenure-track faculty.	6	16	33	26	21	7	2.62	2.17
Q14	Shared services are effectively and equitably administered.	5	11	20	23	30	20	2.13	1.90

Response rate: 19% Responded 110 Eligible 586 (311 Senate, 275 non-Senate)

University Senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median
Q1	UM-D should expand online teaching opportunities.	9	28	21	10	19	0	3.19	2.97
Q2	The Promotion and Tenure Process at UM-D is fair.	11	33	16	13	11	3	3.56	3.59
Q3	The budget system rewards program and degree innovation.	3	11	15	21	28	9	2.02	2.43
Q4	The criteria for merit considerations for my unit is transparent.	12	19	14	21	19	2	2.68	3.17
Q5	The merit pay system in my unit is fair.	8	15	20	16	18	9	2.73	3.25
Q6	Faculty are adequately represented on administrative searches.	8	26	11	13	26	4	2.77	2.50
Q7	Faculty are adequately rewarded for service contributions.	1	12	15	18	40	1	1.67	2.00
Q8	Adequate support is provided for grant writing and research.	5	19	22	18	22	1	2.64	2.58
Q9	My unit provides adequate academic advising.	17	21	20	11	15	3	3.30	3.61
Q10	Salary and Benefits are competitive with similar universities.	5	19	11	25	19	8	2.32	2.89
Q11	The campus is able to adequately attract new faculty.	7	27	17	15	16	5	3.09	2.89
Q12	I am confident that UM-D is maintaining selective standards in admissions.	3	15	18	22	25	5	2.25	2.00
Q13	The campus is making appropriate use of non-tenure-track faculty.	3	14	26	17	20	7	2.62	2.17
Q14	Shared services are effectively and equitably administered.	3	10	13	22	27	12	1.98	1.90

Response rate: 28% Responded 88 Eligible 311

non-senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median
Q1	UM-D should expand online teaching opportunities.	7	3	5	4	2	1	3.40	3.43
Q2	The Promotion and Tenure Process at UM-D is fair.	2	2	5	0	3	10	3.10	2.64
Q3	The budget system rewards program and degree innovation.	2	1	5	4	3	7	2.60	2.39
Q4	The criteria for merit considerations for my unit is transparent.	2	2	2	5	4	7	2.20	2.25
Q5	The merit pay system in my unit is fair.	2	1	4	3	5	6	2.33	1.94
Q6	Faculty are adequately represented on administrative searches.	4	6	3	1	3	5	3.75	3.00
Q7	Faculty are adequately rewarded for service contributions.	2	1	2	6	4	7	2.08	2.08
Q8	Adequate support is provided for grant writing and research.	1	2	4	2	3	9	2.75	2.94
Q9	My unit provides adequate academic advising.	2	2	5	5	4	4	2.50	3.44
Q10	Salary and Benefits are competitive with similar universities.	3	4	6	3	3	3	3.08	3.00
Q11	The campus is able to adequately attract new faculty.	2	3	4	6	0	7	2.88	3.64
Q12	I am confident that UM-D is maintaining selective standards in admissions.	2	2	5	7	4	2	2.36	2.45
Q13	The campus is making appropriate use of non-tenure-track faculty.	3	2	7	9	1	0	2.64	4.08
Q14	Shared services are effectively and equitably administered.	2	1	7	1	3	8	2.93	2.92

Response rate: 8% Responded 22 Eligible 275

Separate reports by unit

College of Arts, Sciences, and Letters

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median
Q1	UM-D should expand online teaching opportunities.	10	16	16	9	13	1	3.12	3.05
Q2	The Promotion and Tenure Process at UM-D is fair.	7	23	13	5	7	10	3.61	2.93
Q3	The budget system rewards program and degree innovation.	2	4	10	16	20	13	1.88	2.56
Q4	The criteria for merit considerations for my unit is transparent.	6	8	10	17	16	8	2.24	2.33
Q5	The merit pay system in my unit is fair.	5	5	16	12	14	11	2.50	2.39
Q6	Faculty are adequately represented on administrative searches.	9	15	9	10	16	7	2.89	2.77
Q7	Faculty are adequately rewarded for service contributions.	3	4	8	16	28	6	1.59	2.03
Q8	Adequate support is provided for grant writing and research.	2	14	16	14	12	7	2.69	3.06
Q9	My unit provides adequate academic advising.	7	9	18	13	14	4	2.69	3.20
Q10	Salary and Benefits are competitive with similar universities.	3	14	12	14	14	8	2.54	3.17
Q11	The campus is able to adequately attract new faculty.	3	19	15	11	9	8	3.07	3.37
Q12	I am confident that UM-D is maintaining selective standards in admissions.	2	9	14	17	18	6	2.21	2.11
Q13	The campus is making appropriate use of non-tenure-track faculty.	2	8	21	21	13	0	2.43	3.18
Q14	Shared services are effectively and equitably administered.	4	7	15	10	16	13	2.50	2.71

Response rate: 19% Responded 66 Eligible 342

College of Education, Health, and Human Services

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median
Q1	UM-D should expand online teaching opportunities.	3	6	1	1	2	0	3.92	3.67
Q2	The Promotion and Tenure Process at UM-D is fair.	1	4	4	1	3	0	3.12	3.38
Q3	The budget system rewards program and degree innovation.	1	1	2	3	5	1	1.83	1.92
Q4	The criteria for merit considerations for my unit is transparent.	1	3	2	4	3	0	2.38	3.00
Q5	The merit pay system in my unit is fair.	1	2	2	2	3	3	2.50	3.00
Q6	Faculty are adequately represented on administrative searches.	2	8	0	1	2	0	3.94	3.86
Q7	Faculty are adequately rewarded for service contributions.	0	2	2	3	6	0	1.67	1.28
Q8	Adequate support is provided for grant writing and research.	0	1	4	1	6	0	1.50	1.38
Q9	My unit provides adequate academic advising.	3	5	3	0	2	0	3.80	3.81
Q10	Salary and Benefits are competitive with similar universities.	2	2	2	3	3	1	2.50	2.38
Q11	The campus is able to adequately attract new faculty.	2	2	3	2	2	2	3.00	2.75
Q12	I am confident that UM-D is maintaining selective standards in admissions.	1	1	4	3	3	1	2.50	2.00
Q13	The campus is making appropriate use of non-tenure-track faculty.	0	1	5	1	2	4	2.80	2.25
Q14	Shared services are effectively and equitably administered.	1	0	3	3	4	2	2.00	2.00

Response rate: 25% Responded 13 Eligible 52

College of Engineering and Computer Science

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median
Q1	UM-D should expand online teaching opportunities.	1	1	4	1	3	0	2.75	3.00
Q2	The Promotion and Tenure Process at UM-D is fair.	1	3	2	3	1	0	3.00	3.00
Q3	The budget system rewards program and degree innovation.	0	1	3	4	2	0	2.25	2.00
Q4	The criteria for merit considerations for my unit is transparent.	2	0	2	3	3	0	2.17	1.62
Q5	The merit pay system in my unit is fair.	2	1	2	3	2	0	2.50	2.83
Q6	Faculty are adequately represented on administrative searches.	0	2	2	1	5	0	1.50	1.28
Q7	Faculty are adequately rewarded for service contributions.	0	0	4	1	5	0	1.50	2.25
Q8	Adequate support is provided for grant writing and research.	1	2	2	2	3	0	2.50	2.00
Q9	My unit provides adequate academic advising.	2	5	0	2	1	0	3.90	3.17
Q10	Salary and Benefits are competitive with similar universities.	1	0	0	5	3	1	1.80	2.25
Q11	The campus is able to adequately attract new faculty.	0	3	2	2	3	0	2.50	2.25
Q12	I am confident that UM-D is maintaining selective standards in admissions.	0	3	2	2	3	0	2.50	2.12
Q13	The campus is making appropriate use of non-tenure-track faculty.	2	4	1	1	1	1	3.88	2.58
Q14	Shared services are effectively and equitably administered.	0	1	1	4	2	2	2.00	1.38

Response rate: 10% Responded 10 Eligible 105

Dearborn College of Business

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median
Q1	UM-D should expand online teaching opportunities.	2	5	5	2	3	0	3.20	2.88
Q2	The Promotion and Tenure Process at UM-D is fair.	4	4	1	3	3	2	3.62	3.70
Q3	The budget system rewards program and degree innovation.	2	6	3	2	3	1	3.50	3.12
Q4	The criteria for merit considerations for my unit is transparent.	5	9	2	0	1	0	4.11	4.42
Q5	The merit pay system in my unit is fair.	2	7	4	1	3	0	3.57	3.75
Q6	Faculty are adequately represented on administrative searches.	1	6	3	1	5	1	3.17	2.75
Q7	Faculty are adequately rewarded for service contributions.	0	6	2	4	4	1	2.50	2.67
Q8	Adequate support is provided for grant writing and research.	3	4	2	2	3	3	3.50	2.88
Q9	My unit provides adequate academic advising.	7	4	3	1	2	0	4.12	4.20
Q10	Salary and Benefits are competitive with similar universities.	2	7	2	3	2	1	3.64	3.57
Q11	The campus is able to adequately attract new faculty.	4	5	1	3	2	2	3.80	3.58
Q12	I am confident that UM-D is maintaining selective standards in admissions.	2	4	2	5	4	0	2.40	2.40
Q13	The campus is making appropriate use of non-tenure-track faculty.	2	3	3	2	5	2	2.67	2.50
Q14	Shared services are effectively and equitably administered.	0	3	1	4	7	2	1.62	3.17

Response rate: 24% Responded 17 Eligible 70

Notes on reporting

Back to AY2014/2015 results

Back to AEC home