Administration Evaluation
Administration Evaluation
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | AY2015/16 median | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching | ||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | The availability of undergraduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent. | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 2.75 | ||||||||
| Q2 | The availability of graduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent. | 1 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3.82 | ||||||||
| Q3 | The technological resources in my classrooms meet my needs. | 4 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.06 | ||||||||
| Q4 | I am provided sufficient graduate student support for my classes. | 6 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4.10 | ||||||||
| Q5 | My teaching load is appropriate. | 8 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.39 | ||||||||
| Q6 | The courses I am asked to teach are appropriate for me. | 10 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.65 | ||||||||
| Q7 | Administrative and research buyouts in my college/school are handled well. | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4.17 | ||||||||
| Q8 | My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 5 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.11 | ||||||||
| Research | ||||||||||||||||
| Q9 | My college/school provides adequate space for my research. | 5 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3.92 | ||||||||
| Q10 | My college/school provides adequate computing resources for my work. | 7 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4.00 | ||||||||
| Q11 | My college/school provides other necessary material resources for my research. | 2 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3.64 | ||||||||
| Q12 | My college/school makes it easy for me to recruit graduate students for my research. | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 2.17 | ||||||||
| Q13 | My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management. | 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.50 | ||||||||
| Q14 | The number of faculty in my college/school is sufficient to support our research mission. | 3 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3.33 | ||||||||
| Q15 | The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities. | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3.00 | ||||||||
| Q16 | My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 7 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4.00 | ||||||||
| Environment | ||||||||||||||||
| Q17 | My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 5 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4.00 | ||||||||
| Q18 | My dean promotes a collegial environment. | 10 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.55 | ||||||||
| Q19 | My dean is responsive when I have concerns. | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.68 | ||||||||
| Q20 | My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances. | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 4.25 | ||||||||
| Q21 | My dean fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4.00 | ||||||||
| Q22 | My dean employs a fair and transparent faculty salary policy. | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 3.33 | ||||||||
| Q23 | My dean facilitates my advancement and recognition. | 6 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3.83 | ||||||||
| Q24 | My dean promotes the strategic interests of the college/school. | 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.50 | ||||||||
| Q25 | I am satisfied with the transparency of my college/school's administrative policies. | 5 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3.86 | ||||||||
| Q26 | I am satisfied with the implementation of my college/school's administrative policies. | 4 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3.79 | ||||||||
| Q27 | My dean makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 6 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3.83 | ||||||||
| Q28 | My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college. | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 2.10 | ||||||||
| Q29 | My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college. | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 2.00 | ||||||||
| Q30 | My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3.40 | ||||||||
| Q31 | I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall. | 9 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4.42 | ||||||||
| Associate Deans | ||||||||||||||||
| Q32 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Donald Zak is fully satisfactory. | 4 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3.67 | ||||||||
| Q33 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Maria Carmen Lemos is fully satisfactory. | 6 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4.10 | ||||||||
| Q34 | The performance of the Interim Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Michaela Zint is fully satisfactory. | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.10 | ||||||||