Administration Evaluation
Administration Evaluation
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | AY2015/16 median | AY2014/15 median | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching | ||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission. | 3 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.00 | 3.00 | |||||||
| Q2 | The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs. | 4 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3.90 | 4.00 | |||||||
| Q3 | Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission. | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 2.17 | |||||||
| Q4 | My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.62 | 4.00 | |||||||
| Research | ||||||||||||||||
| Q5 | The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission. | 2 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.00 | 3.50 | |||||||
| Q6 | The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission. | 0 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3.50 | 3.75 | |||||||
| Q7 | The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities. | 4 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.19 | 4.00 | |||||||
| Q8 | My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.72 | 4.75 | |||||||
| Environment | ||||||||||||||||
| Q9 | My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.57 | 4.75 | |||||||
| Q10 | My dean promotes a collegial environment. | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.72 | 5.00 | |||||||
| Q11 | My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances. | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4.70 | 4.00 | |||||||
| Q12 | I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies. | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.30 | 3.83 | |||||||
| Q13 | I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies. | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.21 | 3.83 | |||||||
| Q14 | My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college. | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2.07 | 2.17 | |||||||
| Q15 | My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 1.86 | 2.00 | |||||||
| Q16 | My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4.25 | 4.25 | |||||||
| Q17 | I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall. | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.62 | 4.50 | |||||||
| Associate Deans | ||||||||||||||||
| Q18 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Education, David Sherman is fully satisfactory. | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2.92 | 2.33 | |||||||
| Q19 | The performance of the Associate Dean For Academic Affairs, Bruce Mueller is fully satisfactory. | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.30 | 4.00 | |||||||
| Q20 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Student Services, Nancy Mason is fully satisfactory. | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.57 | 4.50 | |||||||
| Q21 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Stanley Kent is fully satisfactory. | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 4.33 | ||||||||