Administration Evaluation

Opinions of Faculty (Dearborn Campus)

combined report for all faculty

Senate faculty only

non-senate faculty only

separate reports by unit

combined report for all faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median
Q1	UM-D should expand online teaching opportunities.	15	28	33	23	17	3	3.05	3.23	2.97
Q2	The Promotion and Tenure Process at UM-D is fair.	7	45	21	16	19	11	3.40	3.50	3.59
Q3	The budget system rewards program and degree innovation.	2	12	19	30	44	11	1.82	2.12	2.43
Q4	The criteria for merit considerations for my unit is transparent.	15	26	16	27	30	7	2.50	2.56	3.17
Q5	The merit pay system in my unit is fair.	11	23	29	17	32	9	2.74	2.67	3.25
Q6	Faculty are adequately represented on administrative searches.	8	24	16	24	25	23	2.48	3.04	2.50
Q7	Faculty are adequately rewarded for service contributions.	2	11	15	39	43	9	1.81	1.77	2.00
Q8	Adequate support is provided for grant writing and research.	5	22	27	30	21	14	2.56	2.65	2.58
Q9	My unit provides adequate academic advising.	25	27	27	27	8	6	3.31	3.14	3.61
Q10	Salary and Benefits are competitive with similar universities.	10	25	23	29	21	11	2.67	2.46	2.89
Q11	The campus is able to adequately attract new faculty.	7	32	36	25	17	3	2.96	3.05	2.89
Q12	I am confident that UM-D is maintaining selective standards in admissions.	4	17	27	37	29	6	2.26	2.28	2.00
Q13	The campus is making appropriate use of non-tenure-track faculty.	6	13	35	32	28	6	2.41	2.62	2.17
Q14	Shared services are effectively and equitably administered.	4	12	26	23	30	24	2.26	2.13	1.90

Response rate: 21% Responded 121 Eligible 576 (301 Senate, 275 non-Senate)

University Senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median
Q1	UM-D should expand online teaching opportunities.	11	24	26	21	14	3	3.00	3.19	2.97
Q2	The Promotion and Tenure Process at UM-D is fair.	6	44	17	14	13	5	3.57	3.56	3.59
Q3	The budget system rewards program and degree innovation.	1	9	15	27	40	8	1.72	2.02	2.43
Q4	The criteria for merit considerations for my unit is transparent.	12	22	16	23	23	5	2.62	2.68	3.17
Q5	The merit pay system in my unit is fair.	8	22	27	14	23	7	2.87	2.73	3.25
Q6	Faculty are adequately represented on administrative searches.	4	21	13	21	22	19	2.38	2.77	2.50
Q7	Faculty are adequately rewarded for service contributions.	0	9	12	34	38	6	1.75	1.67	2.00
Q8	Adequate support is provided for grant writing and research.	2	21	23	29	19	5	2.47	2.64	2.58
Q9	My unit provides adequate academic advising.	21	20	25	23	6	5	3.24	3.30	3.61
Q10	Salary and Benefits are competitive with similar universities.	8	20	20	23	19	9	2.65	2.32	2.89
Q11	The campus is able to adequately attract new faculty.	5	28	30	19	16	2	2.97	3.09	2.89
Q12	I am confident that UM-D is maintaining selective standards in admissions.	1	14	22	30	27	6	2.17	2.25	2.00
Q13	The campus is making appropriate use of non-tenure-track faculty.	2	10	31	29	22	6	2.36	2.62	2.17
Q14	Shared services are effectively and equitably administered.	1	11	23	21	27	16	2.19	1.98	1.90

Response rate: 34% Responded 101 Eligible 301

non-senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median
Q1	UM-D should expand online teaching opportunities.	4	4	7	2	3	0	3.21	3.40	3.43
Q2	The Promotion and Tenure Process at UM-D is fair.	1	1	4	2	6	6	2.00	3.10	2.64
Q3	The budget system rewards program and degree innovation.	1	3	4	3	4	3	2.62	2.60	2.39
Q4	The criteria for merit considerations for my unit is transparent.	3	4	0	4	7	2	2.00	2.20	2.25
Q5	The merit pay system in my unit is fair.	3	1	2	3	9	2	1.50	2.33	1.94
Q6	Faculty are adequately represented on administrative searches.	4	3	3	3	3	4	3.17	3.75	3.00
Q7	Faculty are adequately rewarded for service contributions.	2	2	3	5	5	3	2.20	2.08	2.08
Q8	Adequate support is provided for grant writing and research.	3	1	4	1	2	9	3.12	2.75	2.94
Q9	My unit provides adequate academic advising.	4	7	2	4	2	1	3.71	2.50	3.44
Q10	Salary and Benefits are competitive with similar universities.	2	5	3	6	2	2	2.83	3.08	3.00
Q11	The campus is able to adequately attract new faculty.	2	4	6	6	1	1	2.92	2.88	3.64
Q12	I am confident that UM-D is maintaining selective standards in admissions.	3	3	5	7	2	0	2.70	2.36	2.45
Q13	The campus is making appropriate use of non-tenure-track faculty.	4	3	4	3	6	0	2.75	2.64	4.08
Q14	Shared services are effectively and equitably administered.	3	1	3	2	3	8	2.83	2.93	2.92

Response rate: 7% Responded 20 Eligible 275

Separate reports by unit

College of Arts, Sciences, and Letters

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median
Q1	UM-D should expand online teaching opportunities.	8	16	21	14	11	1	2.98	3.12	3.05
Q2	The Promotion and Tenure Process at UM-D is fair.	3	32	12	11	9	5	3.55	3.61	2.93
Q3	The budget system rewards program and degree innovation.	1	1	9	23	30	6	1.59	1.88	2.56
Q4	The criteria for merit considerations for my unit is transparent.	5	14	14	20	16	4	2.42	2.24	2.33
Q5	The merit pay system in my unit is fair.	5	11	21	10	19	7	2.69	2.50	2.39
Q6	Faculty are adequately represented on administrative searches.	6	11	12	11	16	16	2.58	2.89	2.77
Q7	Faculty are adequately rewarded for service contributions.	1	5	5	26	29	5	1.65	1.59	2.03
Q8	Adequate support is provided for grant writing and research.	3	14	17	18	11	8	2.65	2.69	3.06
Q9	My unit provides adequate academic advising.	7	15	17	23	8	2	2.74	2.69	3.20
Q10	Salary and Benefits are competitive with similar universities.	5	13	16	20	10	7	2.62	2.54	3.17
Q11	The campus is able to adequately attract new faculty.	2	18	22	19	10	1	2.80	3.07	3.37
Q12	I am confident that UM-D is maintaining selective standards in admissions.	2	8	17	26	14	5	2.25	2.21	2.11
Q13	The campus is making appropriate use of non-tenure-track faculty.	2	5	22	25	18	0	2.22	2.43	3.18
Q14	Shared services are effectively and equitably administered.	2	6	15	15	19	15	2.13	2.50	2.71

Response rate: 22% Responded 73 Eligible 328

College of Education, Health, and Human Services

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median
Q1	UM-D should expand online teaching opportunities.	2	3	2	2	2	1	3.25	3.92	3.67
Q2	The Promotion and Tenure Process at UM-D is fair.	0	3	4	2	2	1	2.88	3.12	3.38
Q3	The budget system rewards program and degree innovation.	0	2	2	2	5	1	1.75	1.83	1.92
Q4	The criteria for merit considerations for my unit is transparent.	1	2	0	3	5	1	1.67	2.38	3.00
Q5	The merit pay system in my unit is fair.	1	2	2	3	3	1	2.33	2.50	3.00
Q6	Faculty are adequately represented on administrative searches.	0	4	1	4	1	2	2.50	3.94	3.86
Q7	Faculty are adequately rewarded for service contributions.	0	0	0	6	5	1	1.58	1.67	1.28
Q8	Adequate support is provided for grant writing and research.	0	1	1	3	5	2	1.50	1.50	1.38
Q9	My unit provides adequate academic advising.	4	4	3	0	0	1	4.12	3.80	3.81
Q10	Salary and Benefits are competitive with similar universities.	0	2	0	3	4	3	1.67	2.50	2.38
Q11	The campus is able to adequately attract new faculty.	0	3	3	2	2	2	2.83	3.00	2.75
Q12	I am confident that UM-D is maintaining selective standards in admissions.	1	1	3	3	3	1	2.33	2.50	2.00
Q13	The campus is making appropriate use of non-tenure-track faculty.	1	1	4	2	1	3	2.88	2.80	2.25
Q14	Shared services are effectively and equitably administered.	0	1	3	1	2	5	2.67	2.00	2.00

Response rate: 21% Responded 12 Eligible 56

College of Engineering and Computer Science

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median
Q1	UM-D should expand online teaching opportunities.	2	2	5	2	2	0	3.00	2.75	3.00
Q2	The Promotion and Tenure Process at UM-D is fair.	2	2	2	1	5	1	2.50	3.00	3.00
Q3	The budget system rewards program and degree innovation.	1	1	2	4	4	1	2.00	2.25	2.00
Q4	The criteria for merit considerations for my unit is transparent.	3	2	0	1	6	1	1.50	2.17	1.62
Q5	The merit pay system in my unit is fair.	2	3	1	2	5	0	2.25	2.50	2.83
Q6	Faculty are adequately represented on administrative searches.	1	2	1	4	3	2	2.12	1.50	1.28
Q7	Faculty are adequately rewarded for service contributions.	0	1	3	3	5	1	1.83	1.50	2.25
Q8	Adequate support is provided for grant writing and research.	0	1	5	4	3	0	2.38	2.50	2.00
Q9	My unit provides adequate academic advising.	6	3	4	0	0	0	4.33	3.90	3.17
Q10	Salary and Benefits are competitive with similar universities.	3	3	1	1	4	1	3.50	1.80	2.25
Q11	The campus is able to adequately attract new faculty.	2	3	1	3	4	0	2.33	2.50	2.25
Q12	I am confident that UM-D is maintaining selective standards in admissions.	0	4	2	2	5	0	2.25	2.50	2.12
Q13	The campus is making appropriate use of non-tenure-track faculty.	1	4	4	1	2	1	3.25	3.88	2.58
Q14	Shared services are effectively and equitably administered.	0	1	2	3	4	2	1.83	2.00	1.38

Response rate: 12% Responded 13 Eligible 109

Dearborn College of Business

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median
Q1	UM-D should expand online teaching opportunities.	1	6	4	4	2	0	3.12	3.20	2.88
Q2	The Promotion and Tenure Process at UM-D is fair.	2	6	2	1	3	3	3.67	3.62	3.70
Q3	The budget system rewards program and degree innovation.	0	8	3	1	3	2	3.56	3.50	3.12
Q4	The criteria for merit considerations for my unit is transparent.	5	6	2	1	2	1	4.00	4.11	4.42
Q5	The merit pay system in my unit is fair.	2	5	4	1	4	1	3.25	3.57	3.75
Q6	Faculty are adequately represented on administrative searches.	1	5	2	4	4	1	2.50	3.17	2.75
Q7	Faculty are adequately rewarded for service contributions.	1	4	5	4	3	0	2.80	2.50	2.67
Q8	Adequate support is provided for grant writing and research.	2	5	2	2	2	4	3.60	3.50	2.88
Q9	My unit provides adequate academic advising.	8	5	2	2	0	0	4.40	4.12	4.20
Q10	Salary and Benefits are competitive with similar universities.	2	7	2	4	2	0	3.57	3.64	3.57
Q11	The campus is able to adequately attract new faculty.	3	6	6	1	1	0	3.58	3.80	3.58
Q12	I am confident that UM-D is maintaining selective standards in admissions.	1	2	2	5	7	0	1.80	2.40	2.40
Q13	The campus is making appropriate use of non-tenure-track faculty.	2	2	4	3	5	1	2.50	2.67	2.50
Q14	Shared services are effectively and equitably administered.	1	4	4	3	4	1	2.75	1.62	3.17

Response rate: 25% Responded 17 Eligible 67

Notes on reporting

Back to AY2015/2016 results

Back to AEC home