Administration Evaluation

All Chairs in College of Architecture and Urban Planning

sorted by median for each question

Teaching

Q1: The availability of undergraduate course offerings in my program / department is excellent.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	4	9	6	2	4	0	3.56	3.70	4.08
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	0	1	2	1	0	4	3.00	2.50	2.10	3.50	2.25

Q2: The availability of graduate course offerings in my program / department is excellent.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	1	5	0	2	0	0	3.90	3.88	4.12	4.67	4.25
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	5	11	7	1	1	0	3.82	4.04	4.20

Q3: The technological resources in my classrooms meet my needs.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	3	9	5	5	2	1	3.50	3.59	3.58
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	1	2	2	2	1	0	3.00	3.00	2.83	3.00	3.83

Q4: I am provided sufficient graduate student support for my classes.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	1	2	4	1	0	0	3.25	3.62	3.83	3.75	4.17
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	3	5	5	4	3	5	3.10	3.56	3.33

Q5: My teaching load is appropriate.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	6	10	7	2	0	0	3.85	3.92	4.05
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	2	1	1	4	0	0	2.50	3.00	3.64	3.50	3.70

Q6: The courses I am asked to teach are appropriate for me.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	4	2	0	1	1	0	4.50	4.17	4.21	4.79	4.07
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	6	10	6	2	1	0	3.85	4.19	4.60

Q7: Administrative and research buyouts in my department are handled well.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	2	3	3	2	1	13	3.33	4.25	4.50
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	0	2	2	0	1	3	3.25	4.00	3.40	4.50	4.00

Q8: My chair actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	1	2	2	1	2	0	3.00	3.00	3.75	4.67	4.30
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	4	5	5	6	5	0	2.80	3.94	4.78

Research

Q9: My department provides adequate space for my research.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	4	12	3	2	2	2	3.88	4.10	4.65
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	0	0	1	4	2	1	1.88	2.00	2.67	3.75	3.50

Q10: My department provides adequate computing resources for my work.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	4	8	2	7	2	2	3.56	3.79	3.92
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	0	0	4	2	1	1	2.62	2.75	3.25	3.80	3.90

Q11: My department provides other necessary material resources for my research.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	4	5	8	6	1	1	3.12	3.72	4.10
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	0	1	3	1	2	1	2.67	3.00	3.58	3.80	3.83

Q12: My department makes it easy for me to recruit graduate students for my research.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	5	1	7	4	2	6	3.00	3.19	3.42
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	0	2	2	1	2	1	2.75	3.25	3.60	3.86	3.75

Q13: My department provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	5	6	4	4	2	3	3.58	3.56	4.60
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	0	0	2	3	2	1	2.00	3.25	3.50	4.00	4.00

Q14: My chair actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	4	6	5	4	6	0	3.00	3.67	4.64
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	0	2	1	2	3	0	2.00	2.00	4.00	3.88	4.17

Environment

Q15: My chair consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	4	5	2	9	5	0	2.33	3.96	4.62
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	1	1	0	3	3	0	1.83	3.50	3.90	4.00	4.70

Q16: My chair is responsive when I have concerns.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	1	3	2	0	2	0	3.50	3.90	4.00	4.50	4.93
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	6	5	6	3	5	0	3.25	4.07	4.61

Q17: My chair fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	6	7	3	1	3	5	3.93	4.00	4.00
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	0	3	0	0	3	2	2.50	3.50	4.00	4.50	4.50

Q18: My chair employs a fair and transparent faculty salary policy.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	3	3	5	2	4	8	3.00	3.25	3.75
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	0	0	2	0	3	3	1.33	2.00	3.25	3.00	3.75

Q19: My chair facilitates my advancement and recognition.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	4	5	6	3	6	1	3.00	3.44	4.25
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	1	0	3	2	2	0	2.50	2.67	3.60	3.62	4.00

Q20: My chair promotes the strategic interests of the department.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	5	5	6	3	5	1	3.17	3.85	4.62
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	2	1	1	1	3	0	2.50	3.25	3.90	3.90	4.70

Q21: I am satisfied with the transparency of my department's administrative policies.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	1	1	2	1	3	0	2.50	2.33	3.25	4.10	4.50
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	4	3	3	8	6	0	2.25	3.25	4.08

Q22: I am satisfied with the implementation of my department's administrative policies.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	0	2	3	0	3	0	2.83	2.83	3.83	4.00	4.62
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	4	2	8	5	6	0	2.69	3.50	4.20

Q23: My chair makes excellent faculty administrative appointments.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	3	3	9	1	5	4	3.00	3.43	4.00
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	0	0	2	0	2	4	2.00	3.00	3.50	3.50	4.17

Q24: I have confidence in my chair's leadership overall.

Chair	Resp. rate	SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median
Richard Norton, Urban Planning	35%	1	1	2	1	3	0	2.50	3.00	3.90	4.67	4.93
Sharon Haar, Architecture	34%	4	7	1	8	5	0	2.44	3.75	4.43

Notes on reporting

Back to AY2015/2016 results

Back to AEC home