Administration Evaluation
AY2016/2017 Evaluation Results
University-wide evaluations:
Ann Arbor campus administrators:
Dearborn faculty opinions and campus administrators:
Individual Dean and Department Chairs reports by school/college:
Institute and Program Directors
Deans sorted by median responses
Department Chairs sorted by median responses
- All Department Chairs, sorted by median for each question:
Deans reports are available for the Ann Arbor and Flint campuses. Chair reports are available for the Ann Arbor campus only (Dearborn chair results are not released publically). Chairs with fewer than 3 responses are not included in the reports sorted by median.
Give feedback to the Administration Evaluation Committee.
Key to results:
- Resp. rate: % of eligible faculty who responded
- SA = Strongly Agree = 5
- A = Agree = 4
- N = Neutral = 3
- D = Disagree = 2
- SD = Strongly Disagree = 1
- NBJ = No Basis for Judgement
- AY2016/17 median: Interpolated median for AY2016/17 responses
- AY2015/16 median: AY2015/16 median, if available
- AY2014/15 median: AY2014/15 median, if available
- AY2013/14 median: AY2013/14 median, if available
- AY2012/13 median: AY2012/13 median, if available
- AY2011/12 median: AY2011/12 median, if available
- AY2010/11 median: AY2010/11 median, if available
- AY2009/10 median: AY2009/10 median, if available
- AY2008/09 median: AY2008/09 median, if available
- AY2007/08 median: AY2007/08 median, if available
- AY2006/07 median: AY2006/07 median, if available
- AY2005/06 median: AY2005/06 median, if available
- AY2004/05 median: AY2004/05 median, if available
How is the median computed?
Notes on reporting
Back to AEC home