Administration Evaluation
Administration Evaluation
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | AY2016/17 median | AY2015/16 median | AY2014/15 median | AY2013/14 median | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching | ||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission. | 7 | 19 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 3.74 | 3.14 | 3.55 | 3.00 | |||||
| Q2 | The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs. | 10 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 3.92 | 3.40 | 3.57 | 3.50 | |||||
| Q3 | Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission. | 17 | 15 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4.20 | 4.05 | 4.11 | 4.15 | |||||
| Q4 | My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 21 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.18 | 4.52 | 4.68 | |||||
| Research | ||||||||||||||||
| Q5 | The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission. | 12 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 4.00 | 3.21 | 3.67 | 3.85 | |||||
| Q6 | The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission. | 8 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 3.65 | 3.28 | 3.25 | 3.64 | |||||
| Q7 | The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities. | 10 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 3.86 | 2.85 | 3.06 | 3.93 | |||||
| Q8 | My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management. | 16 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 4.29 | ||||||||
| Q9 | My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 23 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.59 | 4.27 | 4.60 | 4.69 | |||||
| Environment | ||||||||||||||||
| Q10 | My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 14 | 17 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4.09 | 3.74 | 4.21 | 4.09 | |||||
| Q11 | My dean promotes a collegial environment. | 22 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4.55 | 3.91 | 4.56 | 4.56 | |||||
| Q12 | My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances. | 15 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 4.57 | 3.93 | 4.33 | 4.71 | |||||
| Q13 | I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies. | 16 | 11 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4.09 | 3.64 | 3.55 | 3.93 | |||||
| Q14 | I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies. | 12 | 12 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3.75 | 3.60 | 3.44 | 3.92 | |||||
| Q15 | My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college. | 7 | 1 | 7 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 2.18 | 1.89 | 2.09 | 2.00 | |||||
| Q16 | My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college. | 6 | 3 | 5 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 2.15 | 1.74 | 2.12 | 1.46 | |||||
| Q17 | My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition | 13 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4.18 | 4.04 | 3.91 | ||||||
| Q18 | I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall. | 23 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4.59 | 4.11 | 4.53 | 4.62 | |||||
| Associate Deans | ||||||||||||||||
| Q19 | The performance of the Senior Associate Dean and Associate Dean for Patient Services, Stephen Stefanac is fully satisfactory. | 18 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4.38 | 4.12 | 4.08 | ||||||
| Q20 | The performance of the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs, Carol Anne Murdoch-Kinch is fully satisfactory. | 21 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.52 | 4.26 | |||||||
| Q21 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Institutional Effectiveness, Lynn Johnson is fully satisfactory. | 11 | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3.89 | 3.46 | 3.46 | ||||||
| Q22 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Russell Taichman is fully satisfactory. | 15 | 14 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4.11 | 3.83 | 3.97 | ||||||
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | AY2016/17 median | AY2015/16 median | AY2014/15 median | AY2013/14 median | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching | ||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission. | 3 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3.83 | 3.30 | 3.67 | 3.00 | |||||
| Q2 | The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs. | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3.88 | 3.06 | 3.40 | 3.50 | |||||
| Q3 | Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission. | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.12 | 4.12 | 4.15 | |||||
| Q4 | My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 8 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4.36 | 3.83 | 4.28 | 4.68 | |||||
| Research | ||||||||||||||||
| Q5 | The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission. | 5 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.00 | 3.20 | 4.06 | 3.85 | |||||
| Q6 | The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission. | 5 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3.70 | 3.58 | 3.67 | 3.64 | |||||
| Q7 | The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities. | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3.50 | 2.75 | 3.42 | 3.93 | |||||
| Q8 | My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management. | 8 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.36 | ||||||||
| Q9 | My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 10 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.60 | 4.21 | 4.63 | 4.69 | |||||
| Environment | ||||||||||||||||
| Q10 | My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 5 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3.93 | 3.50 | 4.50 | 4.09 | |||||
| Q11 | My dean promotes a collegial environment. | 10 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4.60 | 3.83 | 4.56 | 4.56 | |||||
| Q12 | My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances. | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 4.50 | 3.36 | 4.50 | 4.71 | |||||
| Q13 | I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies. | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3.83 | 3.33 | 3.67 | 3.93 | |||||
| Q14 | I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies. | 5 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3.25 | 3.17 | 3.50 | 3.92 | |||||
| Q15 | My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college. | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 1.75 | 1.62 | 2.15 | 2.00 | |||||
| Q16 | My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college. | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 1.67 | 1.50 | 1.89 | 1.46 | |||||
| Q17 | My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition | 5 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4.00 | 3.62 | 3.92 | ||||||
| Q18 | I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall. | 10 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4.60 | 3.83 | 4.56 | 4.62 | |||||
| Associate Deans | ||||||||||||||||
| Q19 | The performance of the Senior Associate Dean and Associate Dean for Patient Services, Stephen Stefanac is fully satisfactory. | 6 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4.21 | 3.70 | 4.00 | ||||||
| Q20 | The performance of the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs, Carol Anne Murdoch-Kinch is fully satisfactory. | 7 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.20 | 4.25 | |||||||
| Q21 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Institutional Effectiveness, Lynn Johnson is fully satisfactory. | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3.25 | 2.95 | 3.22 | ||||||
| Q22 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Russell Taichman is fully satisfactory. | 7 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.83 | 3.81 | 3.86 | ||||||
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | AY2016/17 median | AY2015/16 median | AY2014/15 median | AY2013/14 median | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching | ||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission. | 4 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3.65 | 3.00 | 2.50 | 2.44 | |||||
| Q2 | The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs. | 6 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3.94 | 3.86 | 3.69 | 3.50 | |||||
| Q3 | Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission. | 8 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4.05 | 3.94 | 4.09 | 3.93 | |||||
| Q4 | My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 13 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.58 | 4.31 | 4.68 | 4.21 | |||||
| Research | ||||||||||||||||
| Q5 | The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission. | 7 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4.00 | 3.25 | 2.88 | 4.00 | |||||
| Q6 | The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission. | 3 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 3.62 | 3.00 | 2.60 | 3.67 | |||||
| Q7 | The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities. | 4 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3.94 | 3.00 | 2.38 | 4.00 | |||||
| Q8 | My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management. | 8 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4.25 | ||||||||
| Q9 | My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 13 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.58 | 4.33 | 4.54 | 4.50 | |||||
| Environment | ||||||||||||||||
| Q10 | My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 9 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.20 | 4.00 | 4.06 | 4.17 | |||||
| Q11 | My dean promotes a collegial environment. | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.50 | 3.94 | 4.58 | 4.31 | |||||
| Q12 | My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances. | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 4.61 | 4.50 | 4.17 | 3.83 | |||||
| Q13 | I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies. | 10 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.19 | 3.86 | 3.43 | 3.36 | |||||
| Q14 | I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies. | 7 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3.95 | 3.81 | 3.33 | 3.64 | |||||
| Q15 | My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college. | 4 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 2.31 | 2.10 | 2.00 | 2.50 | |||||
| Q16 | My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college. | 4 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 2.41 | 2.06 | 2.38 | 2.40 | |||||
| Q17 | My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition | 8 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4.23 | 4.25 | 3.90 | ||||||
| Q18 | I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall. | 13 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.58 | 4.25 | 4.50 | 4.00 | |||||
| Associate Deans | ||||||||||||||||
| Q19 | The performance of the Senior Associate Dean and Associate Dean for Patient Services, Stephen Stefanac is fully satisfactory. | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.50 | 4.59 | 4.14 | ||||||
| Q20 | The performance of the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs, Carol Anne Murdoch-Kinch is fully satisfactory. | 14 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.64 | 4.28 | |||||||
| Q21 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Institutional Effectiveness, Lynn Johnson is fully satisfactory. | 8 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.20 | 4.06 | 3.90 | ||||||
| Q22 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Russell Taichman is fully satisfactory. | 8 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4.18 | 3.86 | 4.17 | ||||||