Administration Evaluation
Administration Evaluation
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | AY2016/17 median | AY2015/16 median | AY2014/15 median | AY2013/14 median | AY2012/13 median | AY2011/12 median | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching | ||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission. | 9 | 19 | 9 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 3.55 | 3.07 | 3.59 | 3.17 | 3.50 | 3.36 | |||
| Q2 | The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs. | 5 | 15 | 7 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 2.71 | 2.23 | 3.25 | 2.39 | 3.00 | 2.72 | |||
| Q3 | Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission. | 6 | 27 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3.74 | 3.71 | 3.96 | 3.57 | 3.97 | 4.11 | |||
| Q4 | My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 7 | 21 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 3.57 | 3.11 | 3.79 | 3.63 | 3.96 | 3.96 | |||
| Research | ||||||||||||||||
| Q5 | The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission. | 12 | 19 | 4 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 3.74 | 3.58 | 3.83 | 3.56 | 3.54 | 3.86 | |||
| Q6 | The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission. | 8 | 19 | 9 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 3.55 | 3.54 | 4.00 | 3.82 | 3.86 | 3.70 | |||
| Q7 | The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities. | 5 | 16 | 14 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 3.29 | 3.36 | 3.35 | 3.11 | 3.11 | 3.00 | |||
| Q8 | My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management. | 17 | 19 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 4.03 | ||||||||
| Q9 | My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 16 | 20 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4.00 | 3.60 | 4.10 | 4.00 | 3.97 | 4.15 | |||
| Environment | ||||||||||||||||
| Q10 | My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 3 | 11 | 14 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 2.82 | 2.44 | 3.33 | 2.96 | 3.17 | 3.69 | |||
| Q11 | My dean promotes a collegial environment. | 17 | 11 | 13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 3.64 | 3.08 | 3.92 | 3.80 | 3.96 | 4.15 | |||
| Q12 | My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances. | 5 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 27 | 3.65 | 3.25 | 3.20 | 3.60 | 3.75 | 3.85 | |||
| Q13 | I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies. | 6 | 20 | 5 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 3.52 | 2.62 | 3.50 | 2.69 | 3.17 | 3.68 | |||
| Q14 | I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies. | 7 | 16 | 12 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 3.29 | 2.95 | 3.61 | 3.00 | 3.44 | 3.86 | |||
| Q15 | My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college. | 5 | 3 | 10 | 20 | 8 | 8 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 2.07 | 2.25 | 2.00 | 2.23 | |||
| Q16 | My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college. | 4 | 3 | 11 | 20 | 10 | 6 | 2.20 | 2.15 | 2.18 | 2.05 | 2.00 | 2.17 | |||
| Q17 | My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition | 7 | 12 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 17 | 3.58 | 3.07 | 3.67 | ||||||
| Q18 | I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall. | 15 | 13 | 9 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 3.58 | 3.04 | 3.89 | 3.56 | 3.91 | 4.17 | |||
| Associate Deans | ||||||||||||||||
| Q19 | The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Administration, Sharon Kardia is fully satisfactory. | 21 | 14 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4.14 | 4.25 | 4.44 | ||||||
| Q20 | The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Global Public Health, Matthew Boulton is fully satisfactory. | 16 | 15 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 4.13 | 4.08 | 4.23 | ||||||
| Q21 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Jane Banaszak-Holl is fully satisfactory. | 8 | 27 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 3.96 | 4.00 | 4.07 | ||||||
| Q22 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, John Meeker is fully satisfactory. | 10 | 19 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 3.79 | 3.82 | 3.95 | ||||||