Administration Evaluation
Administration Evaluation
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | AY2017/18 median | AY2016/17 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.95 | 4.92 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.88 | 4.75 |
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the Institute to senior administrators. | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.95 | 4.75 |
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4.94 | 4.80 |
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.86 | 4.67 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous merit review process. | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.86 | 4.88 |
| Q7 | manages administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.89 | 4.67 |
| Q8 | manages the Institute's resources well. | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.94 | 4.50 |
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the Institute. | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.95 | 4.92 |
| Q10 | ensures that Institute policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.88 | 4.92 |
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.89 | 4.62 |