Administration Evaluation
Administration Evaluation
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | AY2017/18 median | AY2016/17 median | AY2015/16 median | AY2014/15 median | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching | ||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | The availability of undergraduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent. | 3 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3.61 | 3.97 | |||||||
| Q2 | The availability of graduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent. | 5 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3.91 | 4.08 | |||||||
| Q3 | The technological resources in my classrooms meet my needs. | 9 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4.15 | 4.44 | |||||||
| Q4 | I am provided sufficient graduate student support for my classes. | 0 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 2.83 | 3.33 | |||||||
| Q5 | My teaching load is appropriate. | 5 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3.92 | 3.86 | |||||||
| Q6 | The courses I am asked to teach are appropriate for me. | 10 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4.23 | 4.30 | |||||||
| Q7 | Administrative and research buyouts in my college/school are handled well. | 2 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3.86 | 3.93 | |||||||
| Q8 | My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 7 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4.00 | 4.21 | |||||||
| Research | ||||||||||||||||
| Q9 | My college/school provides adequate space for my research. | 6 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4.04 | 3.96 | |||||||
| Q10 | My college/school provides adequate computing resources for my work. | 9 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4.14 | 4.00 | |||||||
| Q11 | My college/school provides other necessary material resources for my research. | 6 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3.95 | 3.91 | |||||||
| Q12 | My college/school makes it easy for me to recruit graduate students for my research. | 3 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 2.44 | 3.06 | |||||||
| Q13 | My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management. | 8 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4.09 | 3.97 | |||||||
| Q14 | The number of faculty in my college/school is sufficient to support our research mission. | 8 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4.09 | 3.73 | |||||||
| Q15 | The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities. | 2 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3.60 | 3.62 | |||||||
| Q16 | My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 9 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4.17 | 4.67 | |||||||
| Environment | ||||||||||||||||
| Q17 | My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 9 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3.93 | 4.18 | |||||||
| Q18 | My dean promotes a collegial environment. | 11 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4.22 | 4.66 | |||||||
| Q19 | My dean is responsive when I have concerns. | 11 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4.25 | 4.84 | |||||||
| Q20 | My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances. | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 4.57 | 4.80 | |||||||
| Q21 | My dean fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 9 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4.07 | 4.54 | |||||||
| Q22 | My dean employs a fair and transparent faculty salary policy. | 4 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3.50 | 3.33 | |||||||
| Q23 | My dean facilitates my advancement and recognition. | 9 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3.93 | 4.17 | |||||||
| Q24 | My dean promotes the strategic interests of the college/school. | 13 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4.54 | 4.71 | |||||||
| Q25 | I am satisfied with the transparency of my college/school's administrative policies. | 6 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3.72 | 3.92 | |||||||
| Q26 | I am satisfied with the implementation of my college/school's administrative policies. | 5 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3.61 | 3.93 | |||||||
| Q27 | My dean makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 6 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3.57 | 3.58 | |||||||
| Q28 | My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college. | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 1.92 | 2.25 | |||||||
| Q29 | My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 2 | 1.81 | 2.07 | |||||||
| Q30 | My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition | 6 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 4.00 | 4.61 | |||||||
| Q31 | I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall. | 12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4.36 | 4.70 | |||||||
| Associate Deans | ||||||||||||||||
| Q32 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Global Affairs and Community Engagement, Jody Lori is fully satisfactory. | 7 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4.14 | 4.20 | |||||||
| Q33 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Practice and Professional Graduate Studies, Lisa Low is fully satisfactory. | 5 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3.57 | 4.17 | |||||||
| Q34 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Janean Holden is fully satisfactory. | 2 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3.69 | 3.67 | 3.12 | ||||||
| Q35 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies, Bonnie Hagerty is fully satisfactory. | 3 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3.73 | 3.92 | 3.17 | ||||||
| Q36 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Strategic Affairs, Julia Seng is fully satisfactory. | 4 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3.75 | ||||||||
| Q37 | The performance of the Associate Dean, Faculty Affairs and Faculty Development, Cynthia Arslanian-Engoren is fully satisfactory. | 8 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4.00 | ||||||||