Michigan block M   Administration Evaluation

Chair, Nutritional Sciences, Karen Peterson

combined report for all faculty

AY2017/18
median
AY2016/17
median
AY2015/16
median
Teaching
Q1The availability of undergraduate course offerings in my program / department is excellent.3.504.003.00
Q2The availability of graduate course offerings in my program / department is excellent.3.834.103.50
Q3The technological resources in my classrooms meet my needs.4.004.004.00
Q4I am provided sufficient graduate student support for my classes.4.173.383.00
Q5My teaching load is appropriate.4.674.253.50
Q6The courses I am asked to teach are appropriate for me.4.174.904.25
Q7Administrative and research buyouts in my department are handled well.3.004.123.25
Q8My chair actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.4.004.503.17
Research
Q9My department provides adequate space for my research.4.504.124.17
Q10My department provides adequate computing resources for my work.4.004.173.00
Q11My department provides other necessary material resources for my research.3.753.833.00
Q12My department makes it easy for me to recruit graduate students for my research.2.753.673.75
Q13My chair actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.3.834.803.50
Environment
Q14My chair consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.3.884.103.90
Q15My chair is responsive when I have concerns.4.504.503.50
Q16My chair fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process.4.254.174.25
Q17My chair employs a fair and transparent faculty salary policy.2.754.003.75
Q18My chair facilitates my advancement and recognition.4.254.623.75
Q19My chair promotes the strategic interests of the department.4.904.934.50
Q20I am satisfied with the transparency of my department's administrative policies.3.254.173.50
Q21I am satisfied with the implementation of my department's administrative policies.3.004.003.50
Q22My chair makes excellent faculty administrative appointments.3.754.173.50
Q23I have confidence in my chair's leadership overall.4.004.173.83
Response rate: 24%     Responded 7     Eligible 29     (25 Senate, 4 non-Senate)
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Notes on reporting

Back to AY2017/2018 results

Back to AEC home