Administration Evaluation

Dean, College of Pharmacy, James Dalton

combined report for all faculty

Senate faculty only

non-senate faculty only

combined report for all faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	7	16	3	2	1	0	4.03	4.07	4.00	3.00
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	9	13	3	2	0	2	4.15	4.00	3.90	4.00
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	2	8	6	7	6	0	2.75	2.75	3.00	2.17
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	16	9	4	0	0	0	4.59	4.79	4.62	4.00
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	7	18	2	0	0	2	4.14	3.82	4.00	3.50
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	7	6	5	6	2	3	3.50	3.61	3.50	3.75
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	8	14	0	1	0	6	4.25	4.21	4.19	4.00
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	18	8	1	1	0	1	4.72	4.57
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	22	6	1	0	0	0	4.84	4.86	4.72	4.75
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	20	5	2	1	0	1	4.80	4.83	4.57	4.75
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	23	4	2	0	0	0	4.87	4.91	4.72	5.00
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	16	3	0	1	0	9	4.88	4.92	4.70	4.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	19	5	3	2	0	0	4.74	4.86	4.30	3.83
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	18	6	3	0	1	1	4.72	4.83	4.21	3.83
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	1	2	2	12	11	1	1.75	2.05	2.07	2.17
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1	0	2	11	14	1	1.50	1.95	1.86	2.00
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	14	8	3	0	0	4	4.61	4.50	4.25	4.25
Q18	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	23	6	0	0	0	0	4.87	4.89	4.62	4.50
Associate Deans
Q19	The performance of the Associate Dean For Academic Affairs, Bruce Mueller is fully satisfactory.	13	11	3	1	0	1	4.41	4.72	4.30	4.00
Q20	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Stanley Kent is fully satisfactory.	6	8	3	1	0	11	4.12	4.04	4.33
Q21	The performance of the Associate Dean for Pharmacy Innovations and Partnerships, Hae Mi Choe is fully satisfactory.	7	6	4	0	0	12	4.25	4.56
Q22	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Education, Vicki Ellingrod is fully satisfactory.	14	9	3	0	0	3	4.57	4.43
Q23	The performance of the Associate Dean for Student Services, Nancy Mason is fully satisfactory.	14	11	3	0	0	1	4.50	4.44	4.57	4.50

Response rate: 35% Responded 29 Eligible 82 (50 Senate, 32 non-Senate)

University Senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	6	10	0	2	1	0	4.15	4.25
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	7	8	3	1	0	0	4.19	4.25
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	1	6	4	3	5	0	2.88	3.12
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	10	6	3	0	0	0	4.55	4.77
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	6	12	1	0	0	0	4.21	3.83
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	6	4	4	3	2	0	3.62	3.67
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	7	10	0	1	0	1	4.30	4.57
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	14	3	1	1	0	0	4.82	4.77
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	15	3	1	0	0	0	4.87	4.93
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	12	4	1	1	0	1	4.75	4.83
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	15	2	2	0	0	0	4.87	4.93
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	11	2	0	1	0	5	4.86	4.94
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	11	4	2	2	0	0	4.64	4.83
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	11	4	2	0	1	1	4.68	4.83
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	1	0	2	7	8	1	1.64	1.80
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1	0	2	5	10	1	1.40	1.83
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	8	4	3	0	0	4	4.56	4.50
Q18	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	15	4	0	0	0	0	4.87	4.88
Associate Deans
Q19	The performance of the Associate Dean For Academic Affairs, Bruce Mueller is fully satisfactory.	7	8	2	1	0	1	4.25	4.62
Q20	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Stanley Kent is fully satisfactory.	5	4	2	0	0	8	4.38	4.06
Q21	The performance of the Associate Dean for Pharmacy Innovations and Partnerships, Hae Mi Choe is fully satisfactory.	4	4	2	0	0	9	4.25	4.60
Q22	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Education, Vicki Ellingrod is fully satisfactory.	9	7	2	0	0	1	4.50	4.50
Q23	The performance of the Associate Dean for Student Services, Nancy Mason is fully satisfactory.	9	6	3	0	0	1	4.50	4.50

Response rate: 38% Responded 19 Eligible 50

non-senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	1	6	3	0	0	0	3.83	3.94
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	2	5	0	1	0	2	4.10	3.88
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	1	2	2	4	1	0	2.50	2.00
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	6	3	1	0	0	0	4.67	4.81
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	1	6	1	0	0	2	4.00	3.80
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	1	2	1	3	0	3	3.00	3.50
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	1	4	0	0	0	5	4.12	3.00
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	4	5	0	0	0	1	4.40	4.10
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	7	3	0	0	0	0	4.79	4.71
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	8	1	1	0	0	0	4.88	4.81
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	8	2	0	0	0	0	4.88	4.89
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	5	1	0	0	0	4	4.90	4.83
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	8	1	1	0	0	0	4.88	4.89
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	7	2	1	0	0	0	4.79	4.81
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	0	2	0	5	3	0	1.90	2.30
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	0	0	0	6	4	0	1.67	2.10
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	6	4	0	0	0	0	4.67	4.50
Q18	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	8	2	0	0	0	0	4.88	4.89
Associate Deans
Q19	The performance of the Associate Dean For Academic Affairs, Bruce Mueller is fully satisfactory.	6	3	1	0	0	0	4.67	4.81
Q20	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Stanley Kent is fully satisfactory.	1	4	1	1	0	3	3.88	4.00
Q21	The performance of the Associate Dean for Pharmacy Innovations and Partnerships, Hae Mi Choe is fully satisfactory.	3	2	2	0	0	3	4.25	4.50
Q22	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Education, Vicki Ellingrod is fully satisfactory.	5	2	1	0	0	2	4.70	4.33
Q23	The performance of the Associate Dean for Student Services, Nancy Mason is fully satisfactory.	5	5	0	0	0	0	4.50	4.38

Response rate: 31% Responded 10 Eligible 32

Notes on reporting

Back to AY2017/2018 results

Back to AEC home