Administration Evaluation

Dean, School of Business Administration, D. Scott DeRue

combined report for all faculty

Senate faculty only

non-senate faculty only

combined report for all faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The availability of undergraduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent.	23	23	8	5	1	5	4.20	4.00
Q2	The availability of graduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent.	24	19	11	3	4	4	4.16	4.01
Q3	The technological resources in my classrooms meet my needs.	32	19	10	2	1	0	4.50	4.29
Q4	I am provided sufficient graduate student support for my classes.	17	11	15	10	4	8	3.47	3.68
Q5	My teaching load is appropriate.	19	20	13	6	4	3	3.90	3.94
Q6	The courses I am asked to teach are appropriate for me.	38	17	6	1	2	1	4.66	4.68
Q7	Administrative and research buyouts in my college/school are handled well.	8	9	11	6	6	25	3.23	3.62
Q8	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	20	27	11	3	2	0	4.07	3.92
Research
Q9	My college/school provides adequate space for my research.	24	22	4	1	1	13	4.41	4.48
Q10	My college/school provides adequate computing resources for my work.	32	20	2	5	2	4	4.55	4.32
Q11	My college/school provides other necessary material resources for my research.	25	16	7	4	3	7	4.34	4.26
Q12	My college/school makes it easy for me to recruit graduate students for my research.	14	8	13	8	7	15	3.27	3.50
Q13	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	10	10	12	2	6	25	3.50	3.79
Q14	The number of faculty in my college/school is sufficient to support our research mission.	15	21	9	8	5	7	3.83	3.86
Q15	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	11	9	8	3	3	31	3.83	4.08
Q16	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	17	23	10	7	4	4	3.91	3.93
Environment
Q17	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	14	25	9	6	6	5	3.86	4.00
Q18	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	24	27	6	5	3	0	4.19	4.30
Q19	My dean is responsive when I have concerns.	18	16	5	7	4	15	4.06	4.39
Q20	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	9	5	3	4	4	40	3.80	4.00
Q21	My dean fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process.	13	13	8	4	3	24	3.92	3.32
Q22	My dean employs a fair and transparent faculty salary policy.	9	9	13	7	11	15	3.00	3.08
Q23	My dean facilitates my advancement and recognition.	13	13	23	7	6	3	3.28	3.36
Q24	My dean promotes the strategic interests of the college/school.	31	20	6	2	5	1	4.45	4.22
Q25	I am satisfied with the transparency of my college/school's administrative policies.	16	16	14	8	9	2	3.53	3.38
Q26	I am satisfied with the implementation of my college/school's administrative policies.	17	15	12	6	10	4	3.63	3.18
Q27	My dean makes excellent faculty administrative appointments.	10	17	16	13	7	1	3.22	3.19
Q28	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2	6	10	20	20	7	1.95	2.05
Q29	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1	2	7	19	31	4	1.47	1.87
Q30	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	14	11	7	1	4	27	4.09	3.62
Q31	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	21	24	9	5	6	0	4.02	3.97
Associate Deans
Q32	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Faculty and Research, Francine Lafontaine is fully satisfactory.	25	21	6	3	10	0	4.14	3.70	4.14
Q33	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Student and Academic Excellence, Lynn Wooten is fully satisfactory.	19	6	2	1	7	28	4.58	4.50	4.56	4.25
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Undergraduate and Early Career Programs, Norman Bishara is fully satisfactory.	20	11	10	5	3	15	4.09
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Full-Time and Global MBA, Bradley Killaly is fully satisfactory.	16	13	10	4	7	15	3.81
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Part-Time MBA, Wally Hopp is fully satisfactory.	11	10	8	8	15	13	2.88
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Executive Programs, M.S. Krishnan is fully satisfactory.	9	11	7	5	8	25	3.50	3.58	3.88
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Business and Impact, Gerald Davis is fully satisfactory.	15	9	6	0	10	25	3.94
Q39	The performance of the Associate Dean for Specialty Programs, William Lovejoy is fully satisfactory.	15	6	12	3	6	23	3.50

Response rate: 32% Responded 65 Eligible 202 (133 Senate, 69 non-Senate)

University Senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median
Teaching
Q1	The availability of undergraduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent.	15	18	8	3	1	5	4.08	4.00
Q2	The availability of graduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent.	17	15	10	1	4	3	4.07	3.98
Q3	The technological resources in my classrooms meet my needs.	25	12	10	2	0	0	4.52	4.23
Q4	I am provided sufficient graduate student support for my classes.	13	10	14	7	2	4	3.50	3.79
Q5	My teaching load is appropriate.	15	17	13	2	2	1	3.94	3.96
Q6	The courses I am asked to teach are appropriate for me.	26	15	6	1	1	1	4.56	4.65
Q7	Administrative and research buyouts in my college/school are handled well.	7	9	10	4	5	15	3.35	3.57
Q8	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	15	19	10	3	1	0	4.03	3.88
Research
Q9	My college/school provides adequate space for my research.	21	22	4	1	0	2	4.36	4.41
Q10	My college/school provides adequate computing resources for my work.	26	17	2	4	1	0	4.54	4.22
Q11	My college/school provides other necessary material resources for my research.	21	14	7	3	2	0	4.32	4.23
Q12	My college/school makes it easy for me to recruit graduate students for my research.	14	7	12	8	5	4	3.33	3.42
Q13	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	9	9	10	2	5	15	3.56	3.73
Q14	The number of faculty in my college/school is sufficient to support our research mission.	12	17	9	7	4	1	3.76	3.78
Q15	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	11	9	8	2	2	18	3.94	4.05
Q16	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	14	16	10	7	3	0	3.81	3.73
Environment
Q17	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	10	20	8	4	5	3	3.83	3.96
Q18	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	18	22	5	3	2	0	4.18	4.20
Q19	My dean is responsive when I have concerns.	15	13	5	6	3	8	4.04	4.17
Q20	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	7	5	2	3	3	30	3.90	4.00
Q21	My dean fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process.	11	10	8	3	2	16	3.90	3.36
Q22	My dean employs a fair and transparent faculty salary policy.	7	8	10	5	9	10	3.05	2.94
Q23	My dean facilitates my advancement and recognition.	10	12	17	4	5	2	3.38	3.29
Q24	My dean promotes the strategic interests of the college/school.	24	13	6	2	4	1	4.46	4.12
Q25	I am satisfied with the transparency of my college/school's administrative policies.	12	14	12	6	6	0	3.57	3.32
Q26	I am satisfied with the implementation of my college/school's administrative policies.	13	13	8	4	8	3	3.73	3.10
Q27	My dean makes excellent faculty administrative appointments.	7	12	14	10	6	0	3.11	2.97
Q28	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2	4	8	15	16	5	1.93	2.00
Q29	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1	1	6	10	27	4	1.33	1.75
Q30	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	12	9	7	1	2	18	4.11	3.69
Q31	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	16	16	8	5	5	0	3.94	3.81
Associate Deans
Q32	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Faculty and Research, Francine Lafontaine is fully satisfactory.	20	15	5	3	7	0	4.17	3.54
Q33	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Student and Academic Excellence, Lynn Wooten is fully satisfactory.	13	5	2	1	5	22	4.50	4.54
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Undergraduate and Early Career Programs, Norman Bishara is fully satisfactory.	14	8	9	3	3	12	3.94
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Full-Time and Global MBA, Bradley Killaly is fully satisfactory.	13	9	9	2	6	11	3.78
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Part-Time MBA, Wally Hopp is fully satisfactory.	9	8	6	6	14	7	2.75
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Executive Programs, M.S. Krishnan is fully satisfactory.	6	10	7	5	7	15	3.29	3.31
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Business and Impact, Gerald Davis is fully satisfactory.	13	6	6	0	9	16	3.83
Q39	The performance of the Associate Dean for Specialty Programs, William Lovejoy is fully satisfactory.	13	5	9	3	6	14	3.50

Response rate: 38% Responded 50 Eligible 133

non-senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median
Teaching
Q1	The availability of undergraduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent.	8	5	0	2	0	0	4.56	4.00
Q2	The availability of graduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent.	7	4	1	2	0	1	4.50	4.20
Q3	The technological resources in my classrooms meet my needs.	7	7	0	0	1	0	4.43	4.57
Q4	I am provided sufficient graduate student support for my classes.	4	1	1	3	2	4	3.00	3.17
Q5	My teaching load is appropriate.	4	3	0	4	2	2	3.67	3.88
Q6	The courses I am asked to teach are appropriate for me.	12	2	0	0	1	0	4.88	4.78
Q7	Administrative and research buyouts in my college/school are handled well.	1	0	1	2	1	10	2.25	4.00
Q8	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	5	8	1	0	1	0	4.19	4.25
Research
Q9	My college/school provides adequate space for my research.	3	0	0	0	1	11	4.83	4.88
Q10	My college/school provides adequate computing resources for my work.	6	3	0	1	1	4	4.58	4.83
Q11	My college/school provides other necessary material resources for my research.	4	2	0	1	1	7	4.50	4.67
Q12	My college/school makes it easy for me to recruit graduate students for my research.	0	1	1	0	2	11	2.00	4.50
Q13	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	1	1	2	0	1	10	3.25	4.50
Q14	The number of faculty in my college/school is sufficient to support our research mission.	3	4	0	1	1	6	4.12	4.33
Q15	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	0	0	0	1	1	13	1.50	4.25
Q16	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3	7	0	0	1	4	4.14	4.80
Environment
Q17	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	4	5	1	2	1	2	4.00	4.17
Q18	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	6	5	1	2	1	0	4.20	4.69
Q19	My dean is responsive when I have concerns.	3	3	0	1	1	7	4.17	4.83
Q20	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	2	0	1	1	1	10	3.00	4.00
Q21	My dean fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process.	2	3	0	1	1	8	4.00	3.25
Q22	My dean employs a fair and transparent faculty salary policy.	2	1	3	2	2	5	2.83	3.38
Q23	My dean facilitates my advancement and recognition.	3	1	6	3	1	1	3.00	3.67
Q24	My dean promotes the strategic interests of the college/school.	7	7	0	0	1	0	4.43	4.57
Q25	I am satisfied with the transparency of my college/school's administrative policies.	4	2	2	2	3	2	3.25	3.62
Q26	I am satisfied with the implementation of my college/school's administrative policies.	4	2	4	2	2	1	3.25	3.60
Q27	My dean makes excellent faculty administrative appointments.	3	5	2	3	1	1	3.70	4.25
Q28	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	0	2	2	5	4	2	2.00	2.25
Q29	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	0	1	1	9	4	0	1.89	2.20
Q30	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	2	2	0	0	2	9	4.00	3.25
Q31	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	5	8	1	0	1	0	4.19	4.57
Associate Deans
Q32	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Faculty and Research, Francine Lafontaine is fully satisfactory.	5	6	1	0	3	0	4.08	4.57
Q33	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Student and Academic Excellence, Lynn Wooten is fully satisfactory.	6	1	0	0	2	6	4.75	4.17
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Undergraduate and Early Career Programs, Norman Bishara is fully satisfactory.	6	3	1	2	0	3	4.50
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Full-Time and Global MBA, Bradley Killaly is fully satisfactory.	3	4	1	2	1	4	3.88
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Part-Time MBA, Wally Hopp is fully satisfactory.	2	2	2	2	1	6	3.25
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Executive Programs, M.S. Krishnan is fully satisfactory.	3	1	0	0	1	10	4.67	4.33
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Business and Impact, Gerald Davis is fully satisfactory.	2	3	0	0	1	9	4.17
Q39	The performance of the Associate Dean for Specialty Programs, William Lovejoy is fully satisfactory.	2	1	3	0	0	9	3.50

Response rate: 22% Responded 15 Eligible 69

Notes on reporting

Back to AY2017/2018 results

Back to AEC home