Administration Evaluation

Dean, School of Social Work, Lynn Videka

combined report for all faculty

Senate faculty only

non-senate faculty only

combined report for all faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median
Teaching
Q1	The availability of undergraduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent.	1	7	4	4	0	11	3.50	3.64
Q2	The availability of graduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent.	11	10	2	4	0	0	4.25	3.94
Q3	The technological resources in my classrooms meet my needs.	6	15	1	3	1	1	4.03	4.18
Q4	I am provided sufficient graduate student support for my classes.	3	0	5	5	1	13	2.70	2.79
Q5	My teaching load is appropriate.	9	9	3	6	0	0	4.00	3.96
Q6	The courses I am asked to teach are appropriate for me.	13	11	1	2	0	0	4.45	4.62
Q7	Administrative and research buyouts in my college/school are handled well.	9	6	2	1	0	8	4.50	4.36
Q8	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	9	13	2	1	2	0	4.15	4.07
Research
Q9	My college/school provides adequate space for my research.	8	6	3	1	0	7	4.33	3.96
Q10	My college/school provides adequate computing resources for my work.	10	9	0	1	0	5	4.50	4.14
Q11	My college/school provides other necessary material resources for my research.	8	6	4	0	0	7	4.33	3.92
Q12	My college/school makes it easy for me to recruit graduate students for my research.	5	4	6	3	0	7	3.50	3.69
Q13	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	10	4	4	0	0	7	4.60	4.75
Q14	The number of faculty in my college/school is sufficient to support our research mission.	9	7	0	2	0	7	4.50	4.15
Q15	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	5	7	4	0	0	9	4.07	3.81
Q16	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	11	9	1	0	0	4	4.55	4.29
Environment
Q17	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	8	8	3	4	2	1	3.94	3.82
Q18	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	13	8	1	5	0	0	4.44	4.09
Q19	My dean is responsive when I have concerns.	12	5	4	4	0	2	4.40	4.27
Q20	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	7	3	3	0	1	12	4.50	4.00
Q21	My dean fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process.	5	6	2	2	2	9	3.92	4.21
Q22	My dean employs a fair and transparent faculty salary policy.	4	7	6	1	4	5	3.50	3.62
Q23	My dean facilitates my advancement and recognition.	9	4	5	5	3	1	3.50	3.75
Q24	My dean promotes the strategic interests of the college/school.	13	8	4	2	0	0	4.44	4.50
Q25	I am satisfied with the transparency of my college/school's administrative policies.	8	7	3	4	4	1	3.79	3.10
Q26	I am satisfied with the implementation of my college/school's administrative policies.	8	5	7	3	3	1	3.50	3.55
Q27	My dean makes excellent faculty administrative appointments.	9	7	4	1	4	2	4.00	4.17
Q28	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	3	4	8	7	4	1	2.75	2.42
Q29	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	2	0	10	8	6	1	2.38	2.13
Q30	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	5	8	5	1	1	7	3.88	3.67
Q31	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	12	9	3	3	0	0	4.33	4.20
Associate Deans
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Educational Programs, Mary Ruffolo is fully satisfactory.	8	10	3	2	4	0	3.95	4.25
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs, Joseph Himle is fully satisfactory.	7	10	2	1	1	5	4.15	4.28	4.55
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Rogerio Pinto is fully satisfactory.	6	9	4	0	0	7	4.11

Response rate: 25% Responded 27 Eligible 110 (43 Senate, 67 non-Senate)

University Senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median
Teaching
Q1	The availability of undergraduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent.	1	5	2	1	0	7	3.80	3.75
Q2	The availability of graduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent.	10	4	1	1	0	0	4.70	4.15
Q3	The technological resources in my classrooms meet my needs.	6	6	1	1	1	1	4.25	4.38
Q4	I am provided sufficient graduate student support for my classes.	2	0	5	2	1	6	2.90	2.62
Q5	My teaching load is appropriate.	7	6	2	1	0	0	4.33	4.22
Q6	The courses I am asked to teach are appropriate for me.	10	4	0	2	0	0	4.70	4.77
Q7	Administrative and research buyouts in my college/school are handled well.	8	6	2	0	0	0	4.50	4.42
Q8	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	9	5	1	1	0	0	4.61	4.14
Research
Q9	My college/school provides adequate space for my research.	7	6	2	0	0	0	4.42	4.00
Q10	My college/school provides adequate computing resources for my work.	8	6	0	1	0	0	4.56	4.20
Q11	My college/school provides other necessary material resources for my research.	7	6	2	0	0	0	4.42	3.83
Q12	My college/school makes it easy for me to recruit graduate students for my research.	5	4	5	1	0	0	3.88	3.69
Q13	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	10	4	1	0	0	0	4.75	4.79
Q14	The number of faculty in my college/school is sufficient to support our research mission.	7	7	0	1	0	0	4.43	4.20
Q15	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	5	6	4	0	0	0	4.08	3.83
Q16	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	10	4	1	0	0	0	4.75	4.33
Environment
Q17	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	7	3	2	1	1	1	4.50	3.80
Q18	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	10	4	1	1	0	0	4.70	4.10
Q19	My dean is responsive when I have concerns.	10	2	2	2	0	0	4.70	4.22
Q20	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	6	2	2	0	0	6	4.67	4.50
Q21	My dean fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process.	5	5	2	1	0	3	4.20	4.75
Q22	My dean employs a fair and transparent faculty salary policy.	4	7	2	0	1	2	4.07	4.00
Q23	My dean facilitates my advancement and recognition.	9	2	2	2	1	0	4.61	4.50
Q24	My dean promotes the strategic interests of the college/school.	11	3	1	1	0	0	4.77	4.68
Q25	I am satisfied with the transparency of my college/school's administrative policies.	7	5	1	1	2	0	4.30	3.70
Q26	I am satisfied with the implementation of my college/school's administrative policies.	7	5	2	0	2	0	4.30	4.00
Q27	My dean makes excellent faculty administrative appointments.	8	3	1	0	3	1	4.56	4.21
Q28	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2	3	4	3	4	0	2.75	2.36
Q29	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	2	0	4	4	6	0	2.00	2.04
Q30	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	5	6	1	0	0	4	4.33	3.17
Q31	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	10	4	1	1	0	0	4.70	4.29
Associate Deans
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Educational Programs, Mary Ruffolo is fully satisfactory.	6	7	1	1	1	0	4.21	4.56
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs, Joseph Himle is fully satisfactory.	7	5	1	1	0	2	4.50	4.14
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Rogerio Pinto is fully satisfactory.	5	6	2	0	0	3	4.25

Response rate: 37% Responded 16 Eligible 43

non-senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median
Teaching
Q1	The availability of undergraduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent.	0	2	2	3	0	4	2.75	3.25
Q2	The availability of graduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent.	1	6	1	3	0	0	3.75	3.58
Q3	The technological resources in my classrooms meet my needs.	0	9	0	2	0	0	3.89	3.92
Q4	I am provided sufficient graduate student support for my classes.	1	0	0	3	0	7	2.17	3.00
Q5	My teaching load is appropriate.	2	3	1	5	0	0	3.00	3.00
Q6	The courses I am asked to teach are appropriate for me.	3	7	1	0	0	0	4.14	4.29
Q7	Administrative and research buyouts in my college/school are handled well.	1	0	0	1	0	8	3.50	4.00
Q8	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	0	8	1	0	2	0	3.81	4.00
Research
Q9	My college/school provides adequate space for my research.	1	0	1	1	0	7	3.00	3.83
Q10	My college/school provides adequate computing resources for my work.	2	3	0	0	0	5	4.33	4.00
Q11	My college/school provides other necessary material resources for my research.	1	0	2	0	0	7	3.25	4.17
Q12	My college/school makes it easy for me to recruit graduate students for my research.	0	0	1	2	0	7	2.25	4.00
Q13	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	0	0	3	0	0	7	3.00	4.00
Q14	The number of faculty in my college/school is sufficient to support our research mission.	2	0	0	1	0	7	4.75	4.00
Q15	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	0	1	0	0	0	9	4.00	3.75
Q16	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	1	5	0	0	0	4	4.10	4.25
Environment
Q17	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	1	5	1	3	1	0	3.60	3.83
Q18	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	3	4	0	4	0	0	3.88	4.07
Q19	My dean is responsive when I have concerns.	2	3	2	2	0	2	3.67	4.50
Q20	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	1	1	1	0	1	6	3.50	3.33
Q21	My dean fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process.	0	1	0	1	2	6	1.50	3.90
Q22	My dean employs a fair and transparent faculty salary policy.	0	0	4	1	3	3	2.50	3.25
Q23	My dean facilitates my advancement and recognition.	0	2	3	3	2	1	2.50	3.17
Q24	My dean promotes the strategic interests of the college/school.	2	5	3	1	0	0	3.80	4.21
Q25	I am satisfied with the transparency of my college/school's administrative policies.	1	2	2	3	2	1	2.50	2.75
Q26	I am satisfied with the implementation of my college/school's administrative policies.	1	0	5	3	1	1	2.70	2.90
Q27	My dean makes excellent faculty administrative appointments.	1	4	3	1	1	1	3.50	4.00
Q28	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	1	1	4	4	0	1	2.75	2.50
Q29	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	0	0	6	4	0	1	2.67	2.33
Q30	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	0	2	4	1	1	3	3.00	3.86
Q31	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	2	5	2	2	0	0	3.80	4.12
Associate Deans
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Educational Programs, Mary Ruffolo is fully satisfactory.	2	3	2	1	3	0	3.25	4.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs, Joseph Himle is fully satisfactory.	0	5	1	0	1	3	3.80	4.67
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Rogerio Pinto is fully satisfactory.	1	3	2	0	0	4	3.83

Response rate: 16% Responded 11 Eligible 67

Notes on reporting

Back to AY2017/2018 results

Back to AEC home