Administration Evaluation

Dean, Rackham Graduate School, Michael Solomon

combined report for all faculty

Senate faculty only

non-senate faculty only

combined report for all faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Q1	Rackham distributes funding in an equitable and transparent manner.	40	76	41	38	25	103	3.58	3.61
Q2	Rackham makes student awards in an equitable and transparent manner.	48	91	41	25	14	102	3.82	3.79
Q3	Rackham adequately publicizes its funding allocations to the various graduate programs.	46	66	39	45	29	96	3.49	3.56
Q4	Rackham makes known its policies for allocating funding to the various graduate programs.	36	62	42	55	25	101	3.21	3.29
Q5	Rackham adequately publicizes its distribution of awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	43	70	50	40	18	100	3.54	3.44
Q6	Rackham makes known its policies for making awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	38	76	54	32	19	99	3.56	3.51
Q7	All programs receive roughly the same funding from Rackham per student.	10	18	33	25	31	205	2.58	2.23
Q8	All units receive roughly the same number of awards per student.	11	17	26	25	23	218	2.62	2.25
Q9	Rackham decision-making is transparent.	18	44	53	60	34	109	2.70	2.65
Q10	Rackham allows graduate programs to have influence on policy in proportion to their size.	15	38	33	29	10	190	3.21	2.88
Q11	The Dean of Rackham should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the campus.	48	69	61	33	27	84	3.47
Associate Deans
Q12	The performance of the Associate Dean, Biological and Health Sciences, Peter Hitchcock is fully satisfactory.	36	34	17	4	4	221	4.16	4.01	4.00	3.93	4.08
Q13	The performance of the Associate Dean, Physical Sciences and Engineering, Valeria Bertacco is fully satisfactory.	30	29	22	6	10	223	3.86	3.83
Q14	The performance of the Associate Dean, Humanities and the Arts, Arthur Verhoogt is fully satisfactory.	28	30	19	6	3	232	4.00	3.85

Response rate: 6% Responded 335 Eligible 5268 (3789 Senate, 1479 non-Senate)

University Senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median
Q1	Rackham distributes funding in an equitable and transparent manner.	38	72	40	37	23	78	3.57	3.63
Q2	Rackham makes student awards in an equitable and transparent manner.	47	84	39	24	14	78	3.82	3.79
Q3	Rackham adequately publicizes its funding allocations to the various graduate programs.	44	62	37	42	27	74	3.50	3.57
Q4	Rackham makes known its policies for allocating funding to the various graduate programs.	34	58	40	52	23	79	3.21	3.25
Q5	Rackham adequately publicizes its distribution of awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	40	65	48	40	17	77	3.50	3.40
Q6	Rackham makes known its policies for making awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	35	74	50	31	18	75	3.57	3.49
Q7	All programs receive roughly the same funding from Rackham per student.	9	18	32	25	28	175	2.59	2.21
Q8	All units receive roughly the same number of awards per student.	10	17	25	24	21	188	2.64	2.22
Q9	Rackham decision-making is transparent.	17	41	50	59	31	85	2.68	2.66
Q10	Rackham allows graduate programs to have influence on policy in proportion to their size.	14	33	32	29	10	162	3.12	2.89
Q11	The Dean of Rackham should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the campus.	44	66	55	31	26	64	3.48
Associate Deans
Q12	The performance of the Associate Dean, Biological and Health Sciences, Peter Hitchcock is fully satisfactory.	35	33	14	4	4	191	4.20	4.08	4.00
Q13	The performance of the Associate Dean, Physical Sciences and Engineering, Valeria Bertacco is fully satisfactory.	29	28	19	6	10	193	3.89	3.83
Q14	The performance of the Associate Dean, Humanities and the Arts, Arthur Verhoogt is fully satisfactory.	27	26	17	6	3	205	4.02	3.93

Response rate: 8% Responded 296 Eligible 3789

non-senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median
Q1	Rackham distributes funding in an equitable and transparent manner.	2	4	1	1	2	25	3.75	3.36
Q2	Rackham makes student awards in an equitable and transparent manner.	1	7	2	1	0	24	3.86	3.77
Q3	Rackham adequately publicizes its funding allocations to the various graduate programs.	2	4	2	3	2	22	3.25	3.42
Q4	Rackham makes known its policies for allocating funding to the various graduate programs.	2	4	2	3	2	22	3.25	3.62
Q5	Rackham adequately publicizes its distribution of awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	3	5	2	0	1	23	4.00	3.70
Q6	Rackham makes known its policies for making awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	3	2	4	1	1	24	3.38	3.69
Q7	All programs receive roughly the same funding from Rackham per student.	1	0	1	0	3	30	1.33	2.50
Q8	All units receive roughly the same number of awards per student.	1	0	1	1	2	30	2.00	2.62
Q9	Rackham decision-making is transparent.	1	3	3	1	3	24	3.00	2.60
Q10	Rackham allows graduate programs to have influence on policy in proportion to their size.	1	5	1	0	0	28	4.00	2.88
Q11	The Dean of Rackham should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the campus.	4	3	6	2	1	20	3.33
Associate Deans
Q12	The performance of the Associate Dean, Biological and Health Sciences, Peter Hitchcock is fully satisfactory.	1	1	3	0	0	30	3.33	3.38	4.00
Q13	The performance of the Associate Dean, Physical Sciences and Engineering, Valeria Bertacco is fully satisfactory.	1	1	3	0	0	30	3.33	3.83
Q14	The performance of the Associate Dean, Humanities and the Arts, Arthur Verhoogt is fully satisfactory.	1	4	2	0	0	27	3.88	3.38

Response rate: 3% Responded 39 Eligible 1479

Notes on reporting

Back to AY2018/2019 results

Back to AEC home