Administration Evaluation
Administration Evaluation
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | AY2018/19 median | AY2017/18 median | AY2016/17 median | AY2015/16 median | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching | ||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | The availability of undergraduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent. | 12 | 13 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3.96 | 4.20 | 4.00 | ||||||
| Q2 | The availability of graduate course offerings in my college/school is excellent. | 11 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4.03 | 4.16 | 4.01 | ||||||
| Q3 | The technological resources in my classrooms meet my needs. | 23 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.65 | 4.50 | 4.29 | ||||||
| Q4 | I am provided sufficient graduate student support for my classes. | 11 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 3.90 | 3.47 | 3.68 | ||||||
| Q5 | My teaching load is appropriate. | 15 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4.25 | 3.90 | 3.94 | ||||||
| Q6 | The courses I am asked to teach are appropriate for me. | 21 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4.60 | 4.66 | 4.68 | ||||||
| Q7 | Administrative and research buyouts in my college/school are handled well. | 9 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 3.81 | 3.23 | 3.62 | ||||||
| Q8 | My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 18 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4.40 | 4.07 | 3.92 | ||||||
| Research | ||||||||||||||||
| Q9 | My college/school provides adequate space for my research. | 20 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 4.72 | 4.41 | 4.48 | ||||||
| Q10 | My college/school provides adequate computing resources for my work. | 17 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4.38 | 4.55 | 4.32 | ||||||
| Q11 | My college/school provides other necessary material resources for my research. | 17 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4.53 | 4.34 | 4.26 | ||||||
| Q12 | My college/school makes it easy for me to recruit graduate students for my research. | 9 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 3.71 | 3.27 | 3.50 | ||||||
| Q13 | My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management. | 4 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 3.43 | 3.50 | 3.79 | ||||||
| Q14 | The number of faculty in my college/school is sufficient to support our research mission. | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 3.56 | 3.83 | 3.86 | ||||||
| Q15 | The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities. | 8 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 3.75 | 3.83 | 4.08 | ||||||
| Q16 | My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 12 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3.83 | 3.91 | 3.93 | ||||||
| Environment | ||||||||||||||||
| Q17 | My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 9 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 3.60 | 3.86 | 4.00 | ||||||
| Q18 | My dean promotes a collegial environment. | 18 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4.31 | 4.19 | 4.30 | ||||||
| Q19 | My dean is responsive when I have concerns. | 14 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3.92 | 4.06 | 4.39 | ||||||
| Q20 | My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances. | 9 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 3.42 | 3.80 | 4.00 | ||||||
| Q21 | My dean fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 13 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 3.83 | 3.92 | 3.32 | ||||||
| Q22 | My dean employs a fair and transparent faculty salary policy. | 6 | 3 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 2.85 | 3.00 | 3.08 | ||||||
| Q23 | My dean facilitates my advancement and recognition. | 8 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3.59 | 3.28 | 3.36 | ||||||
| Q24 | My dean promotes the strategic interests of the college/school. | 17 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 4.20 | 4.45 | 4.22 | ||||||
| Q25 | I am satisfied with the transparency of my college/school's administrative policies. | 11 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 3.07 | 3.53 | 3.38 | ||||||
| Q26 | I am satisfied with the implementation of my college/school's administrative policies. | 12 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 3.43 | 3.63 | 3.18 | ||||||
| Q27 | My dean makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 10 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 3.00 | 3.22 | 3.19 | ||||||
| Q28 | My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college. | 0 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 12 | 3 | 2.22 | 1.95 | 2.05 | ||||||
| Q29 | My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college. | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 19 | 3 | 1.45 | 1.47 | 1.87 | ||||||
| Q30 | My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition | 5 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 3.50 | 4.09 | 3.62 | ||||||
| Q31 | My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school. | 11 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3.70 | ||||||||
| Q32 | I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall. | 15 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3.88 | 4.02 | 3.97 | ||||||
| Associate Deans | ||||||||||||||||
| Q33 | The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Faculty and Research, Francine Lafontaine is fully satisfactory. | 20 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4.53 | 4.14 | 3.70 | 4.14 | |||||
| Q34 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Undergraduate and Early Career Programs, Norman Bishara is fully satisfactory. | 17 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 4.53 | 4.09 | |||||||
| Q35 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Full-Time and Global MBA, Bradley Killaly is fully satisfactory. | 17 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4.43 | 3.81 | |||||||
| Q36 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Part-Time MBA, Wally Hopp is fully satisfactory. | 11 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 3.40 | 2.88 | |||||||
| Q37 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Executive Programs, M.S. Krishnan is fully satisfactory. | 11 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 3.79 | 3.50 | 3.58 | 3.88 | |||||
| Q38 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Business and Impact, Gerald Davis is fully satisfactory. | 14 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 4.20 | 3.94 | |||||||
| Q39 | The performance of the Associate Dean for Specialty Programs, William Lovejoy is fully satisfactory. | 11 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 4.00 | 3.50 | |||||||