Administration Evaluation

Chair, Neurosurgery, Karin Muraszko

combined report for all faculty

		AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median	AY2013/14 median	AY2012/13 median	AY2011/12 median	AY2010/11 median	AY2009/10 median	AY2007/08 median	AY2006/07 median	AY2005/06 median
Teaching
Q1	The availability of undergraduate course offerings in my program / department is excellent.	5.00			5.00	4.75	5.00	5.00	5.00	4.75	3.50
Q2	The availability of graduate course offerings in my program / department is excellent.	4.75	4.50	5.00	5.00	4.67	4.75	5.00	4.75	4.75	3.50
Q3	The technological resources in my classrooms meet my needs.	4.83	4.50	4.00	1.00	4.50	5.00	4.83	4.33	4.25	4.00
Q4	I am provided sufficient graduate student support for my classes.	5.00	5.00	4.00	3.00	4.75	5.00	4.75	3.50	4.00	3.00
Q5	My teaching load is appropriate.	4.50	4.50	4.25	3.00	4.70	4.50	4.50	4.67	4.67	4.25
Q6	The courses I am asked to teach are appropriate for me.	4.38	4.75	4.67	4.00	4.62	4.50	4.50	4.67	4.50	4.50
Q7	Administrative and research buyouts in my department are handled well.	3.50	4.00	3.50	4.00	3.33	4.25	5.00	4.00	4.67	4.00
Q8	My chair actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	4.70	4.90	4.50	4.00	4.60	4.62	4.88	4.88	4.17	4.67	4.50	4.75	4.50	5.00
Research
Q9	My department provides adequate space for my research.	4.80	4.90	4.67	4.50	4.25	4.70	4.88	4.00	4.75	4.12
Q10	My department provides adequate computing resources for my work.	4.70	4.50	4.67	3.50	4.60	4.70	4.88	4.12	4.75	4.17
Q11	My department provides other necessary material resources for my research.	4.62	4.90	4.67	4.50	4.00	4.50	4.88	4.00	4.50	3.83
Q12	My department makes it easy for me to recruit graduate students for my research.	4.00	5.00	4.75	4.75	4.50	4.62	4.83	4.50	4.75	4.00
Q13	My chair actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	4.70	4.75	4.50	3.50	4.60	4.70	4.67	4.88	4.75	4.67	4.50	4.90	4.50	4.83
Environment
Q14	My chair consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	3.00	4.50	4.50	3.00	4.20	4.50	4.67	4.50	4.33	4.33	4.83	4.75	4.75	5.00
Q15	My chair is responsive when I have concerns.	3.17	4.00	4.00	4.00	3.75	4.70	4.67	4.75	4.12	4.33
Q16	My chair fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process.	4.00	4.50	4.50	4.00	4.60	4.50	4.67	4.88	4.80	4.88	4.75	4.75	4.75	5.00
Q17	My chair employs a fair and transparent faculty salary policy.	2.50	3.50	4.00	3.00	3.00	4.50	3.25	4.67	3.75	4.25
Q18	My chair facilitates my advancement and recognition.	2.50	4.50	4.50	3.50	3.67	4.50	4.67	4.75	4.17	4.67
Q19	My chair promotes the strategic interests of the department.	4.17	4.50	4.50	3.50	4.00	4.50	4.00	4.75	4.62	4.67
Q20	I am satisfied with the transparency of my department's administrative policies.	2.50	4.00	3.50	3.00	3.00	4.00	3.25	4.50	4.00	4.25
Q21	I am satisfied with the implementation of my department's administrative policies.	3.50	4.00	4.67	3.00	4.00	3.25	3.25	4.50	4.00	4.25
Q22	My chair makes excellent faculty administrative appointments.	4.00	4.50	3.50	3.00	3.00	4.50	4.25	4.50	4.00	4.67
Q23	The performance of the chief (key) administrator is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q24	My chair should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion in the department.	4.00	4.75
Q25	My chair has kept me well informed about developments affecting my department during the pandemic.	4.50
Q26	I have confidence in my chair's leadership overall.	4.50	4.75	4.00	3.50	4.00	4.70	4.67	4.75	4.62	4.50	4.83	4.75	4.17	4.83

Response rate: 36% Responded 8 Eligible 22 (22 Senate, 0 non-Senate)
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Notes on reporting

Back to AY2019/2020 results

Back to AEC home