2008 evaluation results
2008 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2008 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost). | 0 | 5 | 6 | 14 | 83 | 4 | 1.15 |
| Q2 | Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1. | 1 | 8 | 4 | 25 | 68 | 6 | 1.28 |
| Q3 | I support the on-line administration of student teaching evaluations. | 25 | 25 | 20 | 15 | 25 | 3 | 3.25 |
| Q4 | I support the expansion of on-line courses. | 28 | 32 | 21 | 15 | 14 | 2 | 3.66 |
| Q5 | The resources available to promote student retention are adequate. | 3 | 22 | 19 | 30 | 14 | 22 | 2.50 |
| Q6 | Experiential learning opportunities should be widely available to all students. | 37 | 46 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 4.17 |
| Q7 | The level of faculty engagement in events outside their unit is satisfactory. | 3 | 15 | 27 | 29 | 19 | 19 | 2.45 |
| Q8 | There is a satisfactory level of campus effort toward achieving the metropolitan vision. | 6 | 27 | 28 | 20 | 16 | 15 | 2.95 |