2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 24 | 23 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 4.20 | 4.50 | 3.92 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 16 | 17 | 12 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 3.62 | 3.80 | 2.80 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 10 | 22 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 2 | 3.59 | 2.75 | 1.69 |
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 8 | 19 | 10 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 3.25 | 3.08 | 1.86 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 16 | 16 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 3.62 | 3.85 | 3.25 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 13 | 18 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 3.89 | 3.88 | 3.00 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 21 | 19 | 5 | 4 | 10 | 3 | 4.05 | 3.95 | 2.36 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 9 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 7 | 2.95 | 2.42 | 1.42 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 7 | 17 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 14 | 3.50 | 3.44 | 3.17 |
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 14 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 3.53 | 3.50 | 2.25 |