2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 256 | 409 | 150 | 65 | 35 | 114 | 4.01 | 3.85 | 4.03 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 203 | 354 | 207 | 86 | 39 | 140 | 3.82 | 3.75 | 3.84 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 60 | 148 | 235 | 172 | 101 | 312 | 2.86 | 2.80 | 2.99 |
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 100 | 274 | 282 | 84 | 65 | 219 | 3.40 | 3.27 | 3.30 |
| Q5 | effectively represents the interests of the university to the Regents and state officials. | 241 | 345 | 150 | 60 | 38 | 194 | 3.99 | 3.97 | 4.13 |
| Q6 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the university. | 275 | 346 | 152 | 90 | 56 | 107 | 3.97 | 3.82 | 3.93 |
| Q7 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the university. | 244 | 338 | 135 | 33 | 17 | 260 | 4.09 | 3.98 | 4.10 |
| Q8 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 244 | 337 | 179 | 114 | 85 | 66 | 3.80 | 3.64 | 3.72 |