2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 17 | 36 | 16 | 11 | 13 | 6 | 3.68 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 19 | 33 | 13 | 18 | 13 | 3 | 3.62 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 7 | 22 | 13 | 24 | 24 | 9 | 2.38 |
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 5 | 22 | 20 | 17 | 11 | 23 | 2.98 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 12 | 24 | 18 | 8 | 11 | 25 | 3.47 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 7 | 17 | 17 | 14 | 29 | 15 | 2.43 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 13 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 10 | 3.33 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 5 | 22 | 17 | 19 | 19 | 17 | 2.68 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 1 | 13 | 20 | 10 | 13 | 42 | 2.77 |
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 11 | 28 | 16 | 19 | 23 | 2 | 2.91 |