2008 evaluation results
2008 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 143 | 297 | 119 | 62 | 32 | 57 | 3.88 | 3.94 | 4.01 | 3.85 | 4.03 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 111 | 277 | 153 | 60 | 38 | 71 | 3.75 | 3.77 | 3.82 | 3.75 | 3.84 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 39 | 109 | 180 | 151 | 103 | 126 | 2.71 | 2.52 | 2.86 | 2.80 | 2.99 |
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 63 | 208 | 174 | 90 | 57 | 116 | 3.36 | 3.28 | 3.40 | 3.27 | 3.30 |
| Q5 | effectively represents the interests of the university to the Regents and state officials. | 168 | 258 | 114 | 36 | 28 | 105 | 3.98 | 3.93 | 3.99 | 3.97 | 4.13 |
| Q6 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the university. | 180 | 264 | 96 | 67 | 49 | 54 | 3.94 | 3.84 | 3.97 | 3.82 | 3.93 |
| Q7 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the university. | 250 | 271 | 80 | 17 | 11 | 81 | 4.26 | 4.15 | 4.09 | 3.98 | 4.10 |
| Q8 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 155 | 254 | 125 | 75 | 66 | 34 | 3.78 | 3.67 | 3.80 | 3.64 | 3.72 |