2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2.00 | |||||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2.17 | |||||
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2.00 | |||||
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1.25 | |||||
| Q5 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1.75 | |||||
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3.25 | |||||
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2.12 | |||||
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1.75 | |||||
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2.00 | |||||
| Q10 | ensures that departmental policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1.75 | |||||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1.50 |
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 7 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3.75 | |||||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3.62 | |||||
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 4 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3.25 | |||||
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3.75 | |||||
| Q5 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4.00 | |||||
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3.50 | |||||
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4.20 | |||||
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3.75 | |||||
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3.33 | |||||
| Q10 | ensures that departmental policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 8 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 3.25 | |||||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 8 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3.50 |