2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3.12 | 3.00 | ||||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 9 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 3.33 | 2.92 | ||||
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 6 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 2.94 | 2.25 | ||||
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 3.00 | 2.00 | ||||
| Q5 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 3.50 | 2.50 | ||||
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 6 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 3.40 | 3.14 | ||||
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 9 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3.70 | 2.62 | ||||
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 7 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 3.38 | 3.17 | ||||
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 9 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 2.90 | 2.50 | ||||
| Q10 | ensures that departmental policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 10 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 2.50 | 1.50 | ||||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 9 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 2.50 | 2.00 |